Iv never seen the Rampage-Lindland fight. Is it as bad as he is making it out to be???
Nope, it wasn't. Lindland clearly won the first round, Rampage certainly won the second, and the third was a lot closer and less definitive. I guess who you think won would depend on how you score a failed sub.
Lindland's main offense in the third was a guillotine that wasn't fully sunk in, that he held for about a minute. Rampage's strikes were quite a bit stronger and that's likely what earned him the nod from two of the judges.
It is a good fight, so you should see if you can find it.