Yes he definately looked much bigger. Thicker, more volume to his muscles and not quite as lean as he usually is.
For the ridiculous people out there who are translating "bigger" into "taller" refrain from commenting because you have no idea what you are saying. Obviously a 6'2" guy will look taller than a 5'10" guy but every other part of Condit was smaller - smaller arms, smaller legs, smaller shoulders, smaller torso, smaller calves, smaller abdomen... everything. How else would someone that tall be able to weigh in at 170... he can't be bigger!! Fools!!!