Originally Posted by St.Paul Guy
I came here to rip apart these rankings.... but to be honest they look pretty reasonable. I certainly have my gripes, and the dude who had Pat Barry at 4 should not be counted anymore, but I'm all for an established hierarchy for the fans and fighters to be able to point to.
As long as we all realize that the rankings are who is where on "the ladder" and not necessarily the order from best to worst fighter these should be useful.
I never got what the hate behind trying to rank fighters is all about. Probably Chael's little rant about batman vs superman or whatever it was....
I'm all for rankings, if it can be done in a way that isn't more controversial than a Frankie Edgar decision loss.
Sent from my HTC Ruby using VerticalSports.Com App