Originally Posted by khoveraki
When Diaz lost to Condit and Nate was about to fight Bendo, everyone was saying "Nate is so much better than Nick, he's more diverse, he's not just a boxer he has a more complete game" blah blah blah. Then in typical Diaz fashion he gets de-railed. Now all of a sudden, Nick is fighting for the belt and since Nate lost recently, everyone knows that Nick is way better than Nate.
No, they're both incomplete fighters who lose to wrestlers. Rory ragdolled Nate. Two of the judges scored it 30-26.
I've never heard anyone say Nate is better than Nick. Nick Diaz is 10x the fighter Nate is and ime a fan of them both. If you put Nate and Nick in that cage, Nick would win 10 times out of Ten.