But in a sport where one participant is trying to do physical damage to another, the burden of proof should be reversed. We need good scientific evidence to support the assertion that Fox has no advantage as a result of having been born male. Lack of evidence of an advantage isn’t sufficient – especially when so little evidence exists.
Guilty until proven innocent? That's so 1481.
And what the hell is he talking about? There's loads and loads of existing data and I bet even Fox would be willing to undergo tests. It's not like becoming a woman has only been possible since last week.