Originally Posted by Machoman
Tito was a dominant champ in his time. I completely disagree with you. Sure he's annoying an went WAY downhill after his reign, but he was legitimately the best guy at the time. You can't blame him for who was r was not in UFC at he time.
Well you can because he wasn't the best 205 guy in the company at the time.
We have the historical perspective it was
1. Chuck (4-1)
2. Randy (2-2)
3. Tito (0-3)
And then you had Henderson, Shogun, Wanderlei, and Jackson in Pride so Tito could have been the 7th best LHW in the world during his run. Of all of Tito's contemporaries, he was the most protected and his run was the most questionable. I feel like it was politics and money and once Tito started screwing with the money and UFC exposed him for what he was.