Are you guys kidding? Polygraphs are highly controversial tools and are not all that accurate in most applications.
Quote:
|
That would mean the only explanations are either a false test (perhaps it was tampered with) or maybe even someone tampering with / changing sherks supplements.
|
How about the test was innaccurate or misinterpreted? Who conducted the test? What's thier background? Did they have any vested interest? Were they bribed to interpret the data in a favourable manner? The problem with a polygraph test is that you have no baseline comparison. They are useful, but hardly conclusive. Cmon guys, how about a little critical thinking on your part rather than just swallowing whatever you're fed.
"[Polygraph screening] is completely without any theoretical foundation and has absolutely no validity...the diagnostic value of this type of testing is no more than that of astrology or tea-leaf reading."
- Former Supervisory Special Agent Dr. Drew C. Richardson, FBI Laboratory Division