Originally Posted by jasvll

It is in no way, shape, or form a legal case.

It is also a completely different situation, since the commission is under no obligation to prove anything 'beyond a shadow of a doubt.' There is no independent jury. They could take Sherk's license away for no reason as easily as they could take it away for a valid reason. They could take Sherk's license away even if he was able to prove his innocence beyond a shadow of a doubt.