Quote:
Originally Posted by pauly_j
Pulver has brilliant wrestling, better bjj and better striking. The only thing Faber has is slightly better wrestling and good gnp. I see it being close, but with Jens winning.
|
WHAT!!!
Better jits!!?!!?!!!
I disagree sir!
Faber has both better wrestling and better BJJ. Granted Jens is the better striker, but look at what happened to him against J-Lau, KO is right! Not submission...but KO! which means by J-Lau punching Jens in the face. The reason for that: Lauzon's strategy...and i'm guessing Faber's gonna do the same thing.
But back to the point! Faber has better jits and wrestling than Pulver hands down! Majority of Faber's wins: submission. Faber came into MMA as primarily a wrestler, and evolved into the fighter he is today. Wait a couple of years, Faber's gonna be the next mini BJ. Wo knows...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Damone
He's the champ because he beat a bunch of turds to get the title. He finally did something worthwhile by beating Jeff Curran in impressive fashion, but Jens Pulver ain't Jeff Curran.
|
True. He did beat a bunch of turds, no doubt.
But look at the MMA rankings according to Sherdog:
http://sports.espn.go.com/extra/mma/...ory?id=3303808
Faber is ranked #6...where's Pulver? probably down at #35???maybe if he's lucky?