|
Bellator FC Bellator MMA (Bellator) is the 2nd largest mixed martial arts (MMA) promotion in the USA and the largest tournament-based MMA organization in the world. Headquartered in Newport Beach, California, the company was formed in 2008 by Chairman and CEO Bjorn Rebney. Bellator’s events are primarily structured around tournaments. The tournament winner is declared the number one contender in their respective weight class, and is awarded a check for $100,000 and a shot at the reigning Bellator champion. Bellator uses the motto “The Toughest Tournament In Sports” Bellator FC now airs on Spike TV Thursday nights!
 |
|
07-10-2011, 05:29 AM
|
#11 (permalink)
|
|
Featherweight
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,099
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Liddellianenko
So the same Nate that got badly owned by all wrestlers he's faced.
|
Ummmmmm, which are these wrestlers that have owned Nate over the last several years? Chael would handle Askren also.
Okami didn't exactly outwrestle Nate for that win.
So we have Chael, a much bigger man than Ben and possibly the best wrestler in MMA period.
Nate is way ahead of Ben anytime this is on the feet and he has BJJ lightyears ahead of Ben, who hasn't faced anybody nearly as dangerous as Nate in that department.
I just don't see how this is such an easy call on Ben. I would think Nate would be the favourite here.
|
|
|
|
Sponsored Links
|
Advertisement
|
|
07-10-2011, 05:55 AM
|
#12 (permalink)
|
|
KO artist
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Iowa
Posts: 3,223
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fine Wine
Ummmmmm, which are these wrestlers that have owned Nate over the last several years? Chael would handle Askren also.
Okami didn't exactly outwrestle Nate for that win.
So we have Chael, a much bigger man than Ben and possibly the best wrestler in MMA period.
Nate is way ahead of Ben anytime this is on the feet and he has BJJ lightyears ahead of Ben, who hasn't faced anybody nearly as dangerous as Nate in that department.
I just don't see how this is such an easy call on Ben. I would think Nate would be the favourite here.
|
Izuru Takeuchi and Kiuma_Kunioku are also primarily wrestlers and they have multiple wins and draws over Nate.
Okami may not have outwrestled per se but as far as I remember he did utilize the clinch and tie ups a lot which is based off wrestling control as well.
As far as Sonnen being a better wrestler than Askren, that's pure opinion. Askren has far better creds and a much more unorthodox and effective wrestling style, something that made him infamous in his wrestling career.
Sonnen is bigger than Askren yeah, but Marquardt was bigger than him and still got manhandled. People who mention size advantage of weight cutters always seem to forget that the fight will be AT Askren's optimum weight of 170 lbs. That means Nate will have to lose a lot of his muscle mass / stamina to make the fight.
In real terms it comes down to the same thing. Nate at 170 vs Askren will be proportionally smaller.
|
|
|
07-10-2011, 06:03 AM
|
#13 (permalink)
|
|
Featherweight
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,099
|
All good points, but those losses were a long time ago now (and were they in a ring, i.e. ropes? Much easier to take somebody down than in a cage). Nate isn't an easy guy to just dump on his azz, plus he can submit you and he has decent stand-up and could be very dangerous to Askren anytime this is on the feet (see Maia or Kampmann).
Also, you don't loose muscle mass to cut weight, absolutely not. That has a devestating effect on you. You diet very carefully for this and ensure the right intake of foods and portion sizes. It is more about cutting water to make weight. As long as you cut weight right (and perhaps Nate may not be able to make 170 without being too drained), it will always give you a relative advantage over a naturally smaller guy (hence people do it).
As for Sonnen, watching his old fights, his wrestling was average compared to how it is now. Some mention the roids (which may be true), or perhaps he has just adapted it better to MMA over the years. Either way, his wreslting now is freaky in MMA and a lot different to when he came into the sport green as a wrestler which is where Askren is at now.
Last edited by Fine Wine : 07-10-2011 at 06:05 AM.
|
|
|
07-10-2011, 06:26 AM
|
#14 (permalink)
|
|
KO artist
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Iowa
Posts: 3,223
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fine Wine
All good points, but those losses were a long time ago now (and were they in a ring, i.e. ropes? Much easier to take somebody down than in a cage). Nate isn't an easy guy to just dump on his azz, plus he can submit you and he has decent stand-up and could be very dangerous to Askren anytime this is on the feet (see Maia or Kampmann).
Also, you don't loose muscle mass to cut weight, absolutely not. That has a devestating effect on you. You diet very carefully for this and ensure the right intake of foods and portion sizes. It is more about cutting water to make weight. As long as you cut weight right (and perhaps Nate may not be able to make 170 without being too drained), it will always give you a relative advantage over a naturally smaller guy (hence people do it).
As for Sonnen, watching his old fights, his wrestling was average compared to how it is now. Some mention the roids (which may be true), or perhaps he has just adapted it better to MMA over the years. Either way, his wreslting now is freaky in MMA and a lot different to when he came into the sport green as a wrestler which is where Askren is at now.
|
Also true, Sonnen has improved a lot sinze his wrestling career.
But as far as Nate submitting Askren goes, or Askren being a "green" wrestler in MMA, I don't see it.
I mean Askren is already a Brown Belt in BJJ and that's phenomenal considering how short a time he's been at it. And he's obviously far better at it than Sonnen who has some of the worst sub-defence in MMA history, and even he wasn't so much as threatened by Nate's subs.
|
|
|
07-10-2011, 06:45 AM
|
#15 (permalink)
|
|
Featherweight
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,099
|
Yes green was probably a bit stronger word. I meant it in comparison to the experience Sonnen has now (and the same goes for Nate).
Anyways, this may all be a mute point, because by the looks of it, Coker is talking about Nate being signed with SF. One way of keeping Nate under the Zuffa banner whilst looking like the UFC is punishing roid users. They will just merge him back accross to the UFC when they do a SF merger down the rd. Dana is a smart man.
|
|
|
07-10-2011, 07:17 AM
|
#16 (permalink)
|
|
KO artist
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Iowa
Posts: 3,223
|
Ah crap there goes that train. What a soap opera artist Dana turned out to be.
|
|
|
07-10-2011, 03:12 PM
|
#17 (permalink)
|
|
Degenerate Gambler
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Duluth, MN
Posts: 1,633
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fine Wine
Ummmmmm, which are these wrestlers that have owned Nate over the last several years? Chael would handle Askren also.
Okami didn't exactly outwrestle Nate for that win.
So we have Chael, a much bigger man than Ben and possibly the best wrestler in MMA period.
Nate is way ahead of Ben anytime this is on the feet and he has BJJ lightyears ahead of Ben, who hasn't faced anybody nearly as dangerous as Nate in that department.
I just don't see how this is such an easy call on Ben. I would think Nate would be the favourite here.
|
1) In any type of wrestling outside of Greco Roman Ben would likely beat Chael.
2) 
__________________
Sig credit: MC
~ Lifetime Membership sponsored by RustyRenegade ~
|
|
|
07-10-2011, 10:06 PM
|
#18 (permalink)
|
|
The Avy Slut
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 3,342
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fine Wine
All good points, but those losses were a long time ago now (and were they in a ring, i.e. ropes? Much easier to take somebody down than in a cage). Nate isn't an easy guy to just dump on his azz, plus he can submit you and he has decent stand-up and could be very dangerous to Askren anytime this is on the feet (see Maia or Kampmann).
Also, you don't loose muscle mass to cut weight, absolutely not. That has a devestating effect on you. You diet very carefully for this and ensure the right intake of foods and portion sizes. It is more about cutting water to make weight. As long as you cut weight right (and perhaps Nate may not be able to make 170 without being too drained), it will always give you a relative advantage over a naturally smaller guy (hence people do it).
As for Sonnen, watching his old fights, his wrestling was average compared to how it is now. Some mention the roids (which may be true), or perhaps he has just adapted it better to MMA over the years. Either way, his wreslting now is freaky in MMA and a lot different to when he came into the sport green as a wrestler which is where Askren is at now.
|
Nuff said.
__________________
Thanks to limba for this AWESOME sig 
|
|
|
07-11-2011, 02:07 AM
|
#19 (permalink)
|
|
Featherweight
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,099
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by St.Paul Guy
1) In any type of wrestling outside of Greco Roman Ben would likely beat Chael.
2) 
|
What about MMA wrestling? Askren still has a lot more to show
Indestructable, see my next comment about 'green', my bad for wrong use of word.
|
|
|
07-11-2011, 02:33 AM
|
#20 (permalink)
|
|
Degenerate Gambler
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Duluth, MN
Posts: 1,633
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fine Wine
What about MMA wrestling? Askren still has a lot more to show
Indestructable, see my next comment about 'green', my bad for wrong use of word.
|
Askren is a better wrestler in the context of MMA too. Trust me. Askren was possibly the best NCAA wrestler since Cael Sanderson.
In a MMA fight between Chael and Ben Chael would probably win, but that would be a size issue mostly. It wouldn't surprise me if Ben subbed Chael, though.
__________________
Sig credit: MC
~ Lifetime Membership sponsored by RustyRenegade ~
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|