Takedowns are becoming extremely over-valued - MMA Forum - UFC Forums - UFC Results - MMA Videos



Register Now

Not a member yet? Join today - its free!

Blog Panel

Settings & Options
HitOrGetHit HitOrGetHit is offline
HitOrGetHit's Avatar
  • Join Date Jun 2009
  • Posts 19,399
  • Blog Entries 13
Find Blog Entries by HitOrGetHit
Blog Categories
Recent Comments
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
26 27 28 29 30 31 1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 31 1 2 3 4 5
Rate this Entry

Takedowns are becoming extremely over-valued

Posted 01-06-2010 at 11:46 PM by HitOrGetHit
A successful takedown in MMA can show dominance in an MMA fight. But for it to truly be successful, I believe that a fighter should be able to either submit their opponent, or cause damage while on the ground. If a takedown results in nothing for a fighter, then I believe that it should be scored as nothing. If the fighter who scored the takedown could not keep their opponent down long enough to do damage, or they just laid on their opponent, then they should not receive any points for controlling their opponent.

In my opinion, a takedown that led to no submission or no significant damage, is the same thing as a submission attempt that led to nothing. The failed submission attempt does not score any points, so why should a worthless takedown be worth so much? This is why wrestlers have such advantage in MMA as of right now. They can win fights simply by laying on their opponents. This is not t say that wrestlers are not good fighters, but some wrestlers have a habit of taking fighters down and doing nothing significant from that point on.

If a fighter gets a fight to the ground, and then does not do any damage or get a submission, then how much of a fight really happened? I think that people are losing sight of the fact that MMA is still a fight. Wrestling is a part of fighting, but damage must be done after the wrestling aspect is over.

I think that takedowns are the biggest downfall in MMA scoring as of right now. They accomodate way too much to wrestlers and bigger and stronger fighters. I agree that controlling your opponent is a big part of fighting, but even if you are on top, if you are causing no real damage, you are still in defense mode as far as I am concerned.

Comments 3 Email Blog Entry

Total Comments 3
-TheSickness-'s Avatar
You have a point dude, Does this have anything to do with the Thiago Silva Vs Rashad Evans fight?
Posted 01-20-2010 at 04:24 PM by -TheSickness- -TheSickness- is offline
nathan.keith's Avatar
I agree unless it's a slam or a throw. Some takedowns automatically put a fighter in an advantagous position especially judo throws(amazing)but taking your opponent down and ending up in his guard is highly over rated.
Posted 02-04-2010 at 01:37 PM by nathan.keith nathan.keith is offline
HitOrGetHit's Avatar
I always felt they were overrated but I definitely decided top write this after the Rashad/Silva fight.
Posted 02-11-2010 at 08:42 PM by HitOrGetHit HitOrGetHit is offline

Total Trackbacks 0

Recent Blog Entries by HitOrGetHit
Baseball Forum Golf Forum Boxing Forum Snowmobile Forum
Basketball Forum Soccer Forum MMA Forum PWC Forum
Football Forum Cricket Forum Wrestling Forum ATV Forum
Hockey Forum Volleyball Forum Paintball Forum Snowboarding Forum
Tennis Forum Rugby Forums Lacrosse Forum Skiing Forums
Copyright (C) Verticalscope Inc SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2
Powered by vBulletin Copyright 2000-2009 Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
vBCredits v1.4 Copyright ©2007, PixelFX Studios