MMA Forum - UFC Forums - UFC Results - MMA Videos

MMA Forum - UFC Forums - UFC Results - MMA Videos (
-   General MMA Discussion (
-   -   WADA Changes Marijuana Testing Policy, and 1 State Commission in Nevada (

HexRei 05-17-2013 01:08 PM

WADA Changes Marijuana Testing Policy, and 1 State Commission in Nevada


Testing for marijuana in mixed martial arts has become one of the hottest subjects over the last few years. Fighters have tested positive for the drug numerous times, but as marijuana becomes a more socially and legally accepted substance, the rules surrounding the testing processes have come under fire.

Most recently, UFC 159 fighter Pat Healy tested positive for marijuana, which changed his win over Jim Miller to a no-contest. He also lost $130,000 in bonus money he earned for Fight of the Night and Submission of the Night due to the UFC's new policy that no fighter can win post-fight bonuses if he tests positive for drugs.

While some proponents for marijuana want to see the drug not even restricted by testing bodies like state athletic commissions, at the very least most agree that the testing policies should be changed.

Even UFC vice president of regulatory affairs Marc Ratner has spoken out about changes that should be made regarding the use of marijuana in sports like MMA.

"Society is changing, it's a different world now than when I was on the commission. States are legalizing marijuana and it's becoming more and more of a problem with fighters testing positive and the metabolites," said Ratner when speaking in front of the Nevada State Athletic Commission in March. "I think it's something that has to be discussed on a commission level now. Right now I just cannot believe that a performance enhancing drug and marijuana can be treated the same. It just doesn't make sense to the world anymore and it's something that has to be brought up."

The World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA), which oversees drug testing for events such as the Olympics, generally sets the standard in determining drugs that should be deemed as performance enhancing, drugs of abuse or otherwise. WADA also sets the limits for the amount of a substance that can be found in an athlete before the test triggers a red flag.

According to Play True magazine, during a May 11 meeting, WADA's Executive Committee voted to increase the threshold for marijuana testing. The previous limit of 15 ng/mL was raised to a higher threshold of 150 ng/mL.

Starting on May 11, any tests conducted by WADA that do not trigger a result at or above 150 ng/mL will not be considered a positive test for THC, the active ingredient tested for in marijuana.

So how does this ruling potentially affect mixed martial arts?

WADA is seen as the gold standard for testing policies on a worldwide level, but each individual state commission sets its own limits regarding substances such as marijuana. For instance, prior to the May 11 ruling, WADA flagged a test for anything above 15 ng/mL, whereas Nevada has had its limit at 50 ng/mL for more than a decade.

The nanogram levels that trigger a red flag are based on the initial test for the drug. A typical analysis includes two separate tests.

The first test looks for the nanogram levels that would be above a certain amount to flag a positive result. A second test is then run on the sample, looking specifically at the levels for the metabolite Delta-9-THC, which is the major psychoactive ingredient in marijuana.

This new ruling by WADA to increase the acceptable nanogram levels in the initial testing phase could mark major changes to marijuana testing at state commissions, which oversee mixed martial arts competitions.

According to Nevada State Athletic Commission executive director Keith Kizer, who spoke with Bleacher Report on Thursday, the WADA ruling doesn't technically affect the state commission's own testing limits, but it increases the chances that rules may soon change.

The Nevada commission was already planning on holding a hearing later this month to discuss the possibility of changing the marijuana testing rules for athletic competitions. This new WADA rule only strengthens the chances that the commission will recommend at the very least a higher level allowed when testing for marijuana.

"Going forward I mean we already did this once going from 15 ng to 50 ng about 10 years ago. I know this is something the panel will look at," Kizer stated. "They are already looking at going from 50 to something else, but this kind of cuts down on their homework."

The panel that will hopefully meet during a tentatively scheduled May 31 meeting will then make a recommendation that will be taken to the full commission for a vote. Kizer is quick to point out that while WADA did change its testing limits, it did not vote to eliminate marijuana as a restricted drug, so it's not likely any commissions will overstep that particular boundary.

"It both strengthened the anti-marijuana stance by saying we're still going to have it as the same prohibitive substance, but it also lessened it by also saying we're going to try to fine tune the test to make it over 150 as opposed to 15," Kizer stated.

Once the panel meets and comes up with a recommendation, it will likely land on the June or July agenda for the Nevada commission to vote on, and then the change would go into effect.

The next step for Nevada will be the panel discussion likely to happen later this month, and a new testing limit could be set by the end of summer. While all commissions are able to set forth their own rules regarding testing, Nevada acts as one of the national leaders in the industry when it comes to policies regarding these matters, much like WADA does on the worldwide stage.

Marijuana likely won't be removed from the restricted drug lists, but a higher limit for testing could be accepted very soon.
Cool shit! Too late for Healy though...

OU 05-17-2013 01:10 PM

Hopefully other commissions follow. Good shit.

Spite 05-17-2013 03:36 PM

So how much is 150 ng/mL, in real world terms?

OU 05-17-2013 03:39 PM


Originally Posted by Spite (Post 2058418)
So how much is 150 ng/mL, in real world terms?

I'd love to know that as well. For example what were the levels Diaz tested positive for after the Condit fight?

HexRei 05-17-2013 03:48 PM

Not sure about the Condit fight, but Nick tested at 175 ng/mL for the Gomi fight, and Alamo also made a huge deal out of it and acted like it was basically the highest result he'd ever seen. I'd bet most other athletes who've tested positive come in significantly lower. He was probably lower for Condit too.

OU 05-17-2013 03:53 PM


Originally Posted by HexRei (Post 2058474)
Not sure about the Condit fight, but Nick tested at 175 ng/mL for the Gomi fight, and Alamo also made a huge deal out of it and acted like it was basically the highest result he'd ever seen. I'd bet most other athletes who've tested positive come in significantly lower. He was probably lower for Condit too.

Thanks for the info. Just going off the reaction to the failed test I would bet the levels were lower then that for the Condit fight.

Yeah that Gomi shit was LOL. They tried to say Nick was high during the fight and had an unfair advantage since he wouldn't feel pain as much or some BS. Fuuck the technicalities, he finished Gomi in impressive fashion.

HexRei 05-17-2013 04:10 PM

Yeo. I think most reasonable, knowledgeable people have understood that the system is flawed for a long time... its all catch up from here. Sadly those wronged by that shit system probably won't be receiving any remuneration.

dudeabides 09-07-2013 04:28 PM

Nevada commission changed theirs too according to this Site.


If the MMA media was asked to undergo random drug testing and face suspension upon positive test results, we’d never bother getting out of bed in the first place. Our mornings would consist of locating the nearest open bag Cheetos and digging through it for breakfast. Our afternoons would be spent contemplating if the Frito-Lay corporation intended for our fingers to get saturated with flavor powder from the Cheetos just so it stains our fingers orange for the rest of the day and makes us want to return to snacking until we wash our hands. Even our evenings would be spent playing video games until we pass out or get evicted from our domiciles. In the meantime, none of us would write articles, conduct interviews, or update our websites and the world of combat sports news would reside in the hands of fans discussing it on twitter. In other words, nothing would change.

The truth of the matter is: Marijuana is not a performance enhancing drug.

A couple of weeks ago I even talked to Keith Kizer, the head of the Nevada State Athletic Commission (NSAC) about marijuana and MMA. We went on for over a half hour, and at the end of the conversation my animosity towards him dissipated. In a couple of months you can read all of what we talked about in an extensive and exclusive feature for High Times magazine. It's going to be worth it, trust me. Even Chael Sonnen had something to say about marijuana and the sport we all love.

This morning I received an email from Keith Kizer letting me know that as of yesterday, the NSAC has officially raised the testing threshold of marijuana metabolites from 50 ng/mL to 150 ng/mL. That represents a 300% increase, which means you can have 3x more marijuana metabolites in your system before it's a positive test. something unprecedented in the the industry. From our previous conversation we had a couple weeks ago, Kizer told me to expect this to happen sometime this month, and it seems to be in direct response to the public's outcry of the nonsensical demonization of marijuana in MMA. Now that the threshold has been raised, fighters could literally smoke marijuana roughly up until a week before their fight -- although it's best to stay off the green, leafy stuff at least two weeks prior to a 150 ng/ML test just to err on the side of caution.

Now Nick Diaz, stop spinning those nunchucks and come back to MMA. It's safe now. The sport needs you.

M.C 09-07-2013 04:59 PM

Good stuff.

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:13 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 , Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
vBulletin Security provided by vBSecurity v2.2.2 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2017 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2017 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome