What's odd to me is that these rankings are complied by a panel of contributors, yet several wouldn't even consider Curran a top ten fighter at all and he falls to tenth as an aggregate of those who do. He's been a top ten staple at 145 since his BFC weight drop and success there, even after the loss in his second fight with Straus to many. The perspective measured in this list by the panel is not very confidence inspiring to me. Are there really that many people who have been doing it better then Pat at 145? That is a very tough case to make.
I like MMA less because of this forum
Last edited by GDPofDRB; 03-25-2014 at 07:05 PM.