What Would You Rather Watch? - MMA Forum - UFC Forums - UFC Results - MMA Videos
General MMA Discussion Discuss King Of The Cage, Ultimate Challenge UK, and HDNet Fights as well as general mixed martial arts discussion.

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #1 of 22 (permalink) Old 12-16-2007, 06:19 PM Thread Starter
DREAM a little DREAM
cdnbaron's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Whitby, ON
Posts: 1,111
What Would You Rather Watch?

This was prompted by the recent TUF Finale, and the constant discussions of boring fighters/fights etc. So...

What would you rather watch:

A) A highly technical match where two guys make very few mistakes, and are pretty much able to neutralize each other. The fight is less likely to be finished, but probably features two more skilled competitors.


B) A fight that doesn't feature much technique, is more sloppy, but also more likely to be finished due to one guy capitalizing on the other's mistake.

Just curious what everyone else thinks. Personally, I like option A better. I'd rather watch two technicians go at it for 15 minutes. I feel like I learn more by watching a fight like that, and I find it entertaining as well, but that's just a personal preference.

Also, I would've posted a poll, but have never done so before. So this thread is rolling poll-less.
cdnbaron is offline  
Sponsored Links
post #2 of 22 (permalink) Old 12-16-2007, 06:49 PM
attention whore
Damone's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Branson, Missouri
Posts: 14,445
Blog Entries: 1
Great, great topic, cdnbaron. I really hope that this is a multi-pager, because it damn well deserves it. for bringing the content.

I choose option A, too. I like watching skilled guys fight rather than 2 guys being sloppy. If I wanted to watch that, then I'd go buy Ghetto Bum Fight Brawls or whatever. I like the occasional solid brawl, hell, Takayama vs Frye is my all-time second favorite fight, but with option A, you get to see technique, which has always been important to me. I also like to re-watch fights, and with a technical fight that goes 15, I can pick up on new things and try to figure out who won on both sides. With option B, the fun hits you instantly, but the next time you watch it, it's not the same.

Damone is offline  
post #3 of 22 (permalink) Old 12-16-2007, 07:21 PM
JMONEY's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 207
Option A. I usually don't accept low-quality stuff, no matter what. This goes for what I watch to what I eat to what I buy.
JMONEY is offline  
post #4 of 22 (permalink) Old 12-16-2007, 07:26 PM Thread Starter
DREAM a little DREAM
cdnbaron's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Whitby, ON
Posts: 1,111
I'm starting to find more and more that even with the slugfests, while I find them entertaining (as it's hard not to) I also find myself increasingly yelling at the tv for guys to move their heads, use angles coming in, not move straight back, etc. It justs seems to take away some of the mystique those kinds of fights had for me when I first got into the sport.

And with the technical fights, I'm finding them to be increasingly entertaining by looking for guard passes, possible subs, and openings in the striking game that guys can exploit.

I think a lot of what type of fights people prefer has to do with how much MMA they've watched as well.. Newer fans are captivated by the big flashy KOs, as I once was, but as you watch more and more you gain an appreciation for the other aspects of the sport. Training could also have a lot to do with it, when you've actually sparred (which I haven't) or rolled (which I have) it allows you to look at fights a little bit differently. That probably has something to do with my ground game bias too.
cdnbaron is offline  
post #5 of 22 (permalink) Old 12-16-2007, 07:29 PM
Mc19's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 675
Option A for sure. I like brawls, but i liked the technical fights like guida vs. Griffen, and Guida vs. Tavares.
Mc19 is offline  
post #6 of 22 (permalink) Old 12-16-2007, 07:40 PM
toddums's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Seattle
Posts: 870
C: Porn. The answer is always C.

Founding Rockateer of the Wilson Gouveia Rocketship!

Sig by Diesel
toddums is offline  
post #7 of 22 (permalink) Old 12-16-2007, 07:52 PM Thread Starter
DREAM a little DREAM
cdnbaron's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Whitby, ON
Posts: 1,111
Originally Posted by toddums View Post
C: Porn. The answer is always C.
I don't know about that. Even with porn these days I find myself questioning some of the ground technique. Seriously, those dudes have terrible guard passes, and it's not like the girls have a Nog-esque guard or anything.
cdnbaron is offline  
post #8 of 22 (permalink) Old 12-16-2007, 08:05 PM
Das ‹bermensch
wukkadb's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 7,633
I like a mixture of A and B, personally. For instance, I think Rampage is a pretty technical fighter, but also possesses that brawler instinct as well. I think Machida is fun and entertaining to watch, but I would rather watch someone who mixes technical skills and the brawler instinct. As far as the ground game goes though, I love a technical grappling match, but I can't stand lame ass wrestlers who just sit in guard with no posture and throw shitty ass punches and elbows. That shit really bugs me

What a stud

Originally Posted by swpthleg View Post
The power of Aleks, his small baby and pimp hardcore dogs has granted you useful insight, my friend.
wukkadb is offline  
post #9 of 22 (permalink) Old 12-16-2007, 08:14 PM
70seven's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Moncton, Canada
Posts: 1,142
I have to go with A also. A slufgest is only good when the two "sluggers" have good techique, that's why Wandelei Silva and Anderson Silva is fun to watch in a stand up battle. Some it seems like they are just trying to land punches. A great ground chess game cant be very entertaining.
70seven is offline  
post #10 of 22 (permalink) Old 12-16-2007, 08:17 PM
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 312
I like watching a technical fight, now when you have 2 people who are truely working and trying things that is a fantastic thing to watch and when it goes to the ground like that you can usually see some crazy transitions on positions and stuff. Just laying on the opponent and barely working is what i hate.

Watching the more sloppy fights is pretty cool because there are mistakes for the other to make to make for some big moments in fights, not just a KO but submissions and everything as well.

I get enjoyment out of both but i much prefer a really crazy technical fight where both fighters are working to try different things on each other it is the kinda thing that puts me on the edge of my seat wondering what is going to happen who is going to get what or where the fight might go.

Last edited by madroxcide; 12-16-2007 at 08:34 PM.
madroxcide is offline  

Quick Reply

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the MMA Forum - UFC Forums - UFC Results - MMA Videos forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:


Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On

For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome