Anybody else think pride was to brutal? - Page 2 - MMA Forum - UFC Forums - UFC Results - MMA Videos
General MMA Discussion Discuss King Of The Cage, Ultimate Challenge UK, and HDNet Fights as well as general mixed martial arts discussion.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #11 of 26 (permalink) Old 06-27-2008, 02:35 PM
Chocolate City
Image Hosting by Picoodle.com
 
Wise's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 3,505
                     
Knees to a downed opponent almost wipe out most stalling ground positions like north/south in the UFC.

I also dont see that much difference between kicking someone in the face while theyre on their feet as opposed to when theyre trying to get up.

Foot stomps are great because it makes it so an opponent cant just lay on their back until the ref stands them back up into a better position for them.

Say what you want about how brutal they might be but they definitely take out a lot of positions that fighters use to catch their breath or stall fights.

Wise is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #12 of 26 (permalink) Old 06-27-2008, 02:36 PM
Banned
 
Fedor>all's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Cambridge, ON
Posts: 8,796
                     
I never thought it was too brutal, but I probably would if I hadn't seen Vale Tudo matches.

I think the UFC needs to bring the knees to the head of a grounded opponent back.
Fedor>all is offline  
post #13 of 26 (permalink) Old 06-27-2008, 02:38 PM
MMA Fanatic
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 22
 
i definally prefer the Pride rules. I can do with out the head stomps but i think Knees to the downed opponant is a better rule than the elbows if you REALLY have to pick.

As stated early, no knees make for no punishment for lazy/bad shoots. Its alot harder to lean down and punch to the head then it is to knee from a succesful sprawl.

I think stomps are a bit over rated and really haven't been used to change the course of a fight (I know Wandy has had some good ones though) - same can we said for the soccer kick. Off hand I really can't remember when it was used to finish someone (as Opposed to being the exclaimation point on an already TKO). I think Fujita had a few good ones vs Sapp but he finished with punches.

As far as the OP poster saying that Pride is more brutal than UFC. I think early Pride definally didn't stop as quick as UFC does now. I really couldn't see something like Enson Inoue vs Igor V happen in UFC now.
Ferox13 is offline  
post #14 of 26 (permalink) Old 06-27-2008, 02:42 PM
Bantamweight
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 830
               
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ferox13 View Post
i definally prefer the Pride rules. I can do with out the head stomps but i think Knees to the downed opponant is a better rule than the elbows if you REALLY have to pick.

As stated early, no knees make for no punishment for lazy/bad shoots. Its alot harder to lean down and punch to the head then it is to knee from a succesful sprawl.

I think stomps are a bit over rated and really haven't been used to change the course of a fight (I know Wandy has had some good ones though) - same can we said for the soccer kick. Off hand I really can't remember when it was used to finish someone (as Opposed to being the exclaimation point on an already TKO). I think Fujita had a few good ones vs Sapp but he finished with punches.

As far as the OP poster saying that Pride is more brutal than UFC. I think early Pride definally didn't stop as quick as UFC does now. I really couldn't see something like Enson Inoue vs Igor V happen in UFC now.
Exactly, that's why they should have stomps and kicks on the ground.
The Finisher is offline  
post #15 of 26 (permalink) Old 06-27-2008, 02:43 PM
attention whore
 
Damone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Branson, Missouri
Posts: 14,445
Blog Entries: 1
                     
I never cared much for stomps or soccer kicks. To me, they just sort of felt cheap, even though they were legal in Pride. Watching Rogerio just soccer kick the shit out of Sakuraba in their fight was, well, sort of sad, since it was Rogerio, who is awesome, soccer kicking someone who was breaking down.

Of course it was brutal. Shogun vs Kanehara was freakin' brutal, but I'd be lying if I said I didn't enjoy the brutality. I guess it just depends on who is doing the stomping and stuff. Shogun and Wanderlei were really creative, so I dug watching them stomp fools.

Damone is offline  
post #16 of 26 (permalink) Old 06-27-2008, 02:51 PM
MMA Fanatic
 
h2so4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 93
                     
Brutal? YES, Too Brutal? NO. Loved Pride.
h2so4 is offline  
post #17 of 26 (permalink) Old 06-27-2008, 02:51 PM
Back In Black
 
Chrisl972's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Winter Haven, Fl
Posts: 4,185
                     
I always felt like it was too much when the head stomps and soccer kicks were going on. Knees to the head never really bothered me, but those soccer kicks just made me hurt inside.

My thing with that is when you have someone on their hands and knees and you know that they're hurt already. When I saw fights in school or at bars and someone did that, I always wanted to kick the crap out of them for taking such a cheap shot on someone.

Chrisl972 is offline  
post #18 of 26 (permalink) Old 06-27-2008, 02:52 PM
Welterweight
 
Cartheron's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Leeds, UK
Posts: 1,968
                     
The only brutal thing about Pride was that they allowed some fights to go on far longer than they should have. Most stoppages were fine, but some were definately not. Kharitanov/Schilt, Arona/Sakuraba and as someone mentioned Vovchanchyn/Inoue spring to mind as the worst.

Good rules changes in the UFC would be allowing knee's to the head of a grounded opponent (except the straight downwards ones, like the elbow rule). So as to stop Randleman "Skyscraper" knees. Grounded should also be redefined as four points on the ground, not this retardo three points and one of those points is someone's index finger.

That would stop stalling in North/South, give people a good attack to use after defending a takedown, give people a good attack to use in sidemount, would stop people from putting one hand on the ground as a defence (seriously that is some retarded shit). It gives the ground game a good attack to work for and the standup a good attack to capitalise on a mistake or a succesfully defended takedown.

Fav. Fighters
Wanderlei "The Axe Murderer" Silva
Antonio Rodrigo "Minotauro" Nogueira
Ken "You got kicked. By a kick." Shamrock

WAR The CroCop!

I could care less = you care

I couldn't care less = you don't care
Cartheron is offline  
post #19 of 26 (permalink) Old 06-27-2008, 02:56 PM
attention whore
 
Damone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Branson, Missouri
Posts: 14,445
Blog Entries: 1
                     
Randleman's sky scraper knee's reminded me of Wanderlei's ultra nasty death knee's he unleashed on Sakuraba in their first fight. You know, when Sakuraba was turtled up and Silva was freakin' kneeing the shit out of him. Most of those knee's hit the back of his head, too. Pride really seemed to hate Sakuraba for some reason. Maybe Takada was jealous of him or something.

Damone is offline  
post #20 of 26 (permalink) Old 06-27-2008, 03:01 PM
CoutureCop
 
Davisty69's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 6,091
                     
I will be in the minority in this thread and say that I like the kicks/knees to the head of a downed opponent and stomps.

It is more like an actual fight in that you are not limited in the strikes you can throw.

The argument that they are more dangerous doesn't really hold water to me. Any strike, if undefended, can be harmful/fatal. Were someone allowed to get a free Right Hook to your temple, you could die from that. A stomp to the face, if undefended will do that same thing.

However, that is the job of the fighter, to defend against his opponents strikes. They are not problematic if there is a good ref there to stop the fight when necessary.

Allowing knees to the head while standing, or while an opponent is diving in for a leg, but then not allowing them on the ground seems to me to be like making alcohol legal while making Marijuana illegal. They both have relatively similar effects, both are dangerous in their own ways, yet one is illegal and the other is not.

Seems inconsistent. I think people think knees and soccer kicks are more dangerous because it looks more vicious.


Check out MMAforum.com's
Top 25 Fights to show a new MMA fan!!

http://www.mmaforum.com/ufc/69374-to...ml#post1079252
Davisty69 is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the MMA Forum - UFC Forums - UFC Results - MMA Videos forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome