Here's what I think..... - Page 2 - MMA Forum - UFC Forums - UFC Results - MMA Videos
General MMA Discussion Discuss King Of The Cage, Ultimate Challenge UK, and HDNet Fights as well as general mixed martial arts discussion.

View Poll Results: Do you agree?
Yar 10 27.03%
Nar 27 72.97%
Voters: 37. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #11 of 43 (permalink) Old 10-24-2008, 11:13 AM Thread Starter
Banned
 
TheNegation's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 6,809
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Lone Wolf View Post
I think its an integral part of keeping alot of fans happy. If it wasnt for this rule, MMA would likely have folded or declined a long time ago. Sad but true in my opinion.
This isn't about what keeps the fans happy. As I said before this is a sport, not sports entertainment.

Quote:
Originally Posted by bail3yz View Post
I disagree.. if there were no standups you could win fights by just neutralizing your opponents offense.. and just lay on him for 3 rounds. At which point.. MMA would be ruled by strong wrestlers with good sub defense... actually their sub defense would only have to be mediocre because they wouldnt have to do much on the ground.. they could just hold their opponent there.. which be pretty easy to avoid submissions if you werent very active.
That would be the fault of the judges and scoring system, not non-interference in fights by referees to keep people entertained.

Quote:
Originally Posted by HexRei View Post
I'm sorry but even as a big fan Sakuraba vs Royce 1 was just not worth the time. Well, maybe for me, but not the average fan. There is a fine line between strategy and stalling.
Agsin, I'm not talking about whats practical in keeping the fans happy.

You seem to have misunderstood the questio. I'm talking about whats right in principle. I don't actually expect this to change, I just find it ridiculous and think it detracts heavily from the sport.
TheNegation is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #12 of 43 (permalink) Old 10-24-2008, 12:41 PM
-I came|I saw|I failed-
 
plazzman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: The plazzVan
Posts: 9,734
Blog Entries: 3
                     
Neg, what if two fighters just aren't doing ANYTHING, do you believe at this point a yellow card system should be implemented?

Because I mean, you say it's not sports entertainment, and I agree, but there have been some fights that have barely even moved. Lay-n-pray is not a myth, and some fights consists entirely of absolutely nothing.

What do you propose then?
plazzman is offline  
post #13 of 43 (permalink) Old 10-25-2008, 12:03 PM Thread Starter
Banned
 
TheNegation's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 6,809
                     
Absolutely nothing. Fighters that don't entertain usually aren't kept around anyway.
TheNegation is offline  
post #14 of 43 (permalink) Old 10-25-2008, 12:14 PM
Champ
Image Hosting by Picoodle.com
 
yorT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: NC
Posts: 3,541
                     
They should stand them up if they are doing nothing. Should we just let fighters stand there and not strike?




FFL 3rd +90
Mauricio "Shogun" Rua
Demian Maia
Martin Kampmann
Nate Diaz
yorT is offline  
post #15 of 43 (permalink) Old 10-25-2008, 06:32 PM Thread Starter
Banned
 
TheNegation's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 6,809
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by yorT View Post
They should stand them up if they are doing nothing. Should we just let fighters stand there and not strike?
We do, that was one of my original points.
TheNegation is offline  
post #16 of 43 (permalink) Old 10-25-2008, 07:17 PM
Banned
 
bbjd7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Montclair, NJ
Posts: 11,605
Blog Entries: 3
                     
I think stand ups do mess with fights in some situations however I think you went a little too far.

Stand ups are needed in some situations.
bbjd7 is offline  
post #17 of 43 (permalink) Old 10-25-2008, 07:26 PM
I Finish Threads
 
HexRei's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 8,988
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheNegation View Post
Agsin, I'm not talking about whats practical in keeping the fans happy.

You seem to have misunderstood the questio. I'm talking about whats right in principle. I don't actually expect this to change, I just find it ridiculous and think it detracts heavily from the sport.
Well if we're going to do that why not throw out rounds, and timelimits too? Clearly they are artificial impositions on the on sport as well, and affect the outcome of the fight by giving fighters with a lesser gastank a rest.

Personally I think it would detract heavily from the sport to take away standups. Boooooring. Let me say that I agree with you that in the most perfect form of the sport there would be no standups.

But a sport can't succeed without fans, and only the most hardcore fans enjoy an inactive groundgame, so the current incarnation of the sport has to be a compromise between purity of sport and action.

Everybody good, plenty of slaves for my robot colony?
HexRei is offline  
post #18 of 43 (permalink) Old 10-25-2008, 07:31 PM Thread Starter
Banned
 
TheNegation's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 6,809
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by bbjd7 View Post
I think stand ups do mess with fights in some situations however I think you went a little too far.

Stand ups are needed in some situations.
Like when? Standups don't make any sense. They are purely a measure to keep things exciting.
Quote:
Originally Posted by HexRei View Post
Well if we're going to do that why not throw out rounds, and timelimits too? Clearly they are artificial impositions on the on sport as well, and affect the outcome of the fight by giving fighters with a lesser gastank a rest.

Personally I think it would detract heavily from the sport to take away standups. Boooooring. Let me say that I agree with you that in the most perfect form of the sport there would be no standups.
What? Rounds and timelimits don't give an uneven advantage to either fighter, so that really has no relevance.

So you think keeping the fights entertaining is more important than keeping it fair and legitimate competition?
TheNegation is offline  
post #19 of 43 (permalink) Old 10-25-2008, 07:49 PM
I Finish Threads
 
HexRei's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 8,988
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheNegation View Post
What? Rounds and timelimits don't give an uneven advantage to either fighter, so that really has no relevance.
It rewards the fighter with the lesser gastank, as I already said. So you think giving the fighters a little rest period to recover is more important than keeping the fight a fair and legitimate competition? As a guy whose biggest strength is his cardio, I am offended sir. You are trying to take my best weapon away.

Quote:
So you think keeping the fights entertaining is more important than keeping it fair and legitimate competition?
I don't think standups make the fight unfair- each fighter knows that a standup is a possibility coming into the fight, and that they need to keep their groundgame active to avoid that. If that discriminates against a fighter with a slow, boring groundgame, I don't see how that's any worse than a special rule forcing rest periods which definitely is more helpful to the fighter with poorer cardio.

Everybody good, plenty of slaves for my robot colony?
HexRei is offline  
post #20 of 43 (permalink) Old 10-25-2008, 07:57 PM
GMW
International Stalker
 
GMW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: San Diego
Posts: 5,203
Blog Entries: 2
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by HexRei View Post
It rewards the fighter with the lesser gastank, as I already said. So you think giving the fighters a little rest period to recover is more important than keeping the fight a fair and legitimate competition? As a guy whose biggest strength is his cardio, I am offended sir. You are trying to take my best weapon away.
Ok, this is just ridiculous. You can't compare time limits and rounds to what he is proposing. And the way you're defending it is, I imagine, a joke to try and make him look stupid?


Credit to ThaMuffinMan
GMW is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the MMA Forum - UFC Forums - UFC Results - MMA Videos forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome