NSAC Adds Instant Replay. - MMA Forum - UFC Forums - UFC Results - MMA Videos
General MMA Discussion Discuss King Of The Cage, Ultimate Challenge UK, and HDNet Fights as well as general mixed martial arts discussion.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #1 of 15 (permalink) Old 08-19-2009, 06:45 PM Thread Starter
Flyweight
 
geoff0011's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 424
                     
NSAC Adds Instant Replay.

Quote:
There’s a saying in our little world: as the Nevada State Athletic Commission goes, so goes MMA. Nah, I just made that up right now, but it might as well be a saying. The NSAC plays a pivotal role in dictating general policy in the fight world, and for the most part they’ve set the gold standard that California has repeatedly failed to live up to. Now they’re really getting with the times and adding instant replay for MMA (they're not the first, however), but only for specific circumstances. Keith Kizer explains when replay can be used:


“It will be on the immediate ending of a fight due to injury and the referee feels that it would be beneficial to him or her to review the tape to see what the cause of the injury was. What caused that injury - was it a foul, was it a legal blow?”


In other words, Kevin Burns’ TKO victory via eye-poke against Anthony Johnson could be reviewed, but we’re not going to be running the tape back to every inside leg kick to see if was really a groin shot – unless it’s a groin shot that ends the fight, in which case it will probably be pretty obvious.

So that’s good news, right? No more “lack of remedy” problems for fights that end with fouls, and the next time somebody callously forces their eye into one of Cro Cop’s fingers there will actually be some consequences beyond just blurred vision. But the NSAC didn’t stop there, they also clarified their rules on greasing so they apply specifically for MMA and not just boxing:


“Boxing rules state that you can’t have excessive greasing. But we clarified that today and made it specific to MMA, that you cannot have any type of foreign substance on your body, hair, gloves or clothing that could result in an unfair advantage. But again it is up to the referee as the sole arbiter to judge whether or not any such foul took place and if it did, how it should be handled.”


We all know what the genesis of this rule clarification is, but does it actually solve anything?

In the case of GSP the NSAC wiped him down with a towel when they became aware that there was Vaseline on his back. Typically these greasing accusations imply that the guilty party found a way to get slippery other than wantonly applying some greasing agent between rounds, so in order for the referee to do anything he’d have to be able to see that the fighter has grease coming out of his pores, which seems tough to do. Call me crazy, but I don’t think this minor concession is going to be enough to get B.J. Penn to call off his fatwa against the state of the Nevada.
http://www.cagepotato.com/nsac-adds-...ow-bj%E2%80%99

About time!
geoff0011 is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 15 (permalink) Old 08-19-2009, 07:03 PM
M.C
.:DISTURBED:.
 
M.C's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: California
Posts: 13,839
                     
Interesting, although I'm not exactly sure what to think of it.
M.C is offline  
post #3 of 15 (permalink) Old 08-19-2009, 08:49 PM
Curitiba Food and Liquor
 
swpthleg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: NY
Posts: 16,176
Blog Entries: 14
                     
I think this is a big step forward for MMA and will vastly decrease debacles like BJ's "fatwa". I love that the writer used that word.


Sig Credit to Toxic
swpthleg is offline  
post #4 of 15 (permalink) Old 08-19-2009, 11:48 PM
CoutureCop
 
Davisty69's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 6,091
                     
I think the instant replay is a fantastic, and long overdue, rule change.

The greasing rule is pretty much just semantics. We all know that the rule as it has been changed too, is what was assumed in every fight.

Maybe we can get a crystal clear "back of the head" rule now.


Check out MMAforum.com's
Top 25 Fights to show a new MMA fan!!

http://www.mmaforum.com/ufc/69374-to...ml#post1079252
Davisty69 is offline  
post #5 of 15 (permalink) Old 08-20-2009, 06:00 AM
Middleweight
 
Couchwarrior's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: the couch
Posts: 2,689
                     
Great news! I don't get why some people are against it.
Couchwarrior is offline  
post #6 of 15 (permalink) Old 08-20-2009, 06:26 AM
"I <3 Trolls"
 
TraMaI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 6,923
                     
Great news. I wanted instant replay but only if it was implemented this exact way. Kudos, NSAC.
TraMaI is offline  
post #7 of 15 (permalink) Old 08-22-2009, 12:31 PM
Free Thinker
 
pt447's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: In your closet!
Posts: 5,673
Blog Entries: 1
                     
Instant replay is a good idea. It seems that it will only be used in instances where a fight ends in a controversial decision, which is a very good idea.

Hey, if it has instant replay is must be a legitimate sport now, right? That means the results matter and it's not just a spectacle!

whiskey, racism, money, grease, twinkie's, guns.....yep lol thats about it

http://www.watchblog.com/

http://www.xanga.com/mfalino
pt447 is offline  
post #8 of 15 (permalink) Old 08-22-2009, 12:57 PM
Flyweight
 
dafunguru's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 305
                     
Wait, I don't get it. So when ever there's a controversial stoppage, the ref can watch the replay and rethink his decision?
dafunguru is offline  
post #9 of 15 (permalink) Old 08-22-2009, 12:58 PM
CoutureCop
 
Davisty69's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 6,091
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by pt447 View Post
Instant replay is a good idea. It seems that it will only be used in instances where a fight ends in a controversial decision, which is a very good idea.

Hey, if it has instant replay is must be a legitimate sport now, right? That means the results matter and it's not just a spectacle!
Good point. This shows, like you said, that the outcome of the match, what is actually written down on paper, gets top billing.

It is only one step in the right direction though.


Check out MMAforum.com's
Top 25 Fights to show a new MMA fan!!

http://www.mmaforum.com/ufc/69374-to...ml#post1079252
Davisty69 is offline  
post #10 of 15 (permalink) Old 08-22-2009, 01:32 PM
Ultra-weight
 
slapshot's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Spokane
Posts: 6,331
                     
Instant replay is horrible for combat sports.

for example,

Fighter A has been out pointed in the first and second rounds, the fight has been competitive and fighter A has shown he's a powerful striker but fighter B has just edged him in every round until now...in 3:56 of the third round fighter A has fighter B in a position to end the fight, and fighter B is hurt, the bells are ringing! ref jumps in and the fights over. However a ref ringside (or Dana White) has deemed it a "early stoppage" so we go to review.

After five or so minutes of review two or so minutes to communicate the situation and three or so minutes to stop/restart the fight (giving fighter B time to fully recover) the stoppage is deemed too early taking away the advantage fighter A had when fighter B was rocked, sure you can put them back on the mat in the same position but short of a seal club you cant recreate the advantage.

Fighter B gets on his bicycle and gets out of the round he also wins the fight in a unanimous decision.

This has the potential to ruin the sport.

"I fear no man, but Jim Harrison and Mike Stone are the two last men that I would wish to meet in an alley fight. Jim Harrison's fighting style is not flamboyant or spectacular, it's just simple and deadly!" - Bruce Lee sakurabushidokan.homestead.com
slapshot is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the MMA Forum - UFC Forums - UFC Results - MMA Videos forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome