NSAC approves MMA instant replay; anti-greasing ‘BJ Penn rule’ - MMA Forum - UFC Forums - UFC Results - MMA Videos
General MMA Discussion Discuss King Of The Cage, Ultimate Challenge UK, and HDNet Fights as well as general mixed martial arts discussion.

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #1 of 4 (permalink) Old 08-20-2009, 11:23 PM Thread Starter
Any Weight, Anytime...
 
Jamal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 447
                     
NSAC approves MMA instant replay; anti-greasing ‘BJ Penn rule’

NSAC approves MMA instant replay; anti-gre

http://mmamania.com/2009/08/20/nsac-...-bj-penn-rule/



The Nevada State Athletic Commission (NSAC) yesterday approved the inclusion of instant replay within the sport of mixed martial arts to better assist referees in the UFC and other organizations in determining the outcome of televised fights.

Passed on August 19, the NSAC specifically examined the relevance of instant replay as it pertains to fight-ending injuries or fouls, particularly those that may or may not have been ruled a technical knockout, like in the case of Anthony Johnson vs. Kevin Burns at UFC Fight Night 14.

The implementation of instant replay is going to be limited in its application (by design). The purpose is to preserve the integrity of a contest’s outcome rather than find faults with judgment calls.

From the commission:

“A referee at the conclusion of a contest or exhibition stopped immediately due to an injury to an unarmed combatant pursuant to NAC 467.718 and after making a decision, may view a replay if available in order to determine whether the injury in question was caused a legal blow or a foul.”

Also getting the nod from the NSAC is the “BJ Penn Rule,” enacted to prohibit any type of greasing agent or foreign substance applied to a fighter’s body that may give them an unfair advantage in competition.

Any such substance will now be categorized as a foul under the current guidelines.

The rule was unceremoniously named after Penn as a result of the hubbub that came out of UFC 94 last January. Penn was overwhelmed by Georges St. Pierre in their welterweight title fight but complained to the athletic commission following the bout that “Rush” had been slathered in Vaseline, effectively nullifying his guard.

While footage showed the GSP camp being a bit too generous with the grease, no action was taken because there was no precedent set for that type of infraction. The incident was also ruled to be unintentional and without malice but Penn’s consolation prize is written language that will penalize future fighters who grease with intent to cheat.
Jamal is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 4 (permalink) Old 08-20-2009, 11:41 PM
M.C
.:DISTURBED:.
 
M.C's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: California
Posts: 13,039
                     
M.C is offline  
post #3 of 4 (permalink) Old 08-21-2009, 12:49 AM Thread Starter
Any Weight, Anytime...
 
Jamal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 447
                     
Oh damn dude, sorry i thought it was new :P
Jamal is offline  
post #4 of 4 (permalink) Old 08-22-2009, 06:43 PM
Bantamweight
 
mrmyz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 812
                     
This is an amazing decision by the athletic commission and I hope that other commissions implement this rule. Its very disheartening to both fighters and fans when a fighter who should have legitimately won or who was robbed of a victory due to an illegal blow losses. Like with the Rumble Johnson fight this could have been overturned and they could have had a no contest and done it again. With rulings like this and the recent ruling on performance enhancers (the commission will now overturn a victory if a fighter tests positive) the commission is sending out a message that it is not playing any games and promotes fair fighting.

In a world where fair play is going out the window, its nice to see some one is doing something about it. I can remember a couple of fights that I would have liked to see more action taken because one combatant was insisting on landing illegal blows. Cheick Congo for instance is one of those fighters who is well known for landing groin shots.

p.s. Im still loling over the fact that BJ fans are still claiming his loss was due to GSP greasing up. Get over it.

MMA Pics Record
15 - 4 - 1
mrmyz is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the MMA Forum - UFC Forums - UFC Results - MMA Videos forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome