NSAC adds 5 round non title fights. - Page 2 - MMA Forum - UFC Forums - UFC Results - MMA Videos
General MMA Discussion Discuss King Of The Cage, Ultimate Challenge UK, and HDNet Fights as well as general mixed martial arts discussion.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #11 of 19 (permalink) Old 08-23-2009, 06:10 AM
MMA Fanatic
 
gaz_berserk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Milan
Posts: 38
   
i thinck that this new rule is grate because is better to understand who is the better fighter in 5 rounds than in 3 rounds look the Ortiz vs Griffin fight or the Ortiz vs Evans fight or the Bisping vs Hammil fight or the Franklin vs Henderson fight all this fight was close...
gaz_berserk is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #12 of 19 (permalink) Old 08-23-2009, 07:17 AM
Light Heavyweight
 
Biowza's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 3,474
Blog Entries: 1
                     
I'd rather them fix up their scoring system before they start adding more rounds.
Biowza is offline  
post #13 of 19 (permalink) Old 08-23-2009, 07:40 AM
Lightweight
 
Freelancer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,658
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by Davisty69 View Post
I have two questions then.

1) would you rather title fights be 3 rounds then as well for the reason you listed? Why should a fight be leaning towards the fighter with great conditioning simply because it is a title fight?

2) Wouldn't you say that conditioning and strength are kind of two ends of the spectrum? The guy that is more explosive usually sacrifices conditioning and lasting power for the ability to finish the fight in the first round. To me, each fighter gears himself to how he wants to fight.
1)No. Because a fighter who wants to win the title has to have both conditioning and skill.

2)Yes, they are. But you can't always have both, and as I said, if a fighter knows he has to fight for five rounds he will deliberately set a slow pace. This will lead to more boring decisions. I want fights to have less rounds and to be more explosive.

"He who defeats himself is the mightiest warrior" - Confucius(I think)
Freelancer is offline  
post #14 of 19 (permalink) Old 08-24-2009, 10:54 AM
Bantamweight
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 642
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by Freelancer View Post

2)Yes, they are. But you can't always have both, and as I said, if a fighter knows he has to fight for five rounds he will deliberately set a slow pace. This will lead to more boring decisions. I want fights to have less rounds and to be more explosive.
Except no fighter thinks that way. When was the last time you saw a fighter take a slow pace because he wanted to go all 5 rounds? Fights simply don't approach a fight in that fashion, and if this applies for "Special fights", it's not going to be nobodies in these fights. They would be like Franklin vs Wandy. True competitors where the scenario you fear would never even come into question.
imrik32 is offline  
post #15 of 19 (permalink) Old 08-24-2009, 11:49 AM
Lightweight
 
Freelancer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,658
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by imrik32 View Post
Except no fighter thinks that way. When was the last time you saw a fighter take a slow pace because he wanted to go all 5 rounds? Fights simply don't approach a fight in that fashion, and if this applies for "Special fights", it's not going to be nobodies in these fights. They would be like Franklin vs Wandy. True competitors where the scenario you fear would never even come into question.
Let's just hope that it will be limited to special fights.

"He who defeats himself is the mightiest warrior" - Confucius(I think)
Freelancer is offline  
post #16 of 19 (permalink) Old 08-24-2009, 12:25 PM
Flyweight
 
wado lado's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 204
             
i think they should have it as if the fight is really close at the end of 3 rounds then they add the extra two to get a decisive winner



Hey
wado lado is offline  
post #17 of 19 (permalink) Old 08-26-2009, 01:17 PM
Any Weight, Anytime...
 
Jamal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 447
                     
This would be awesome, there are alot of 3 rounders which need 5 rounds to really decide a winner

Jamal is offline  
post #18 of 19 (permalink) Old 08-26-2009, 02:05 PM
Welterweight
 
BrianRClover's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Saint Louis MO
Posts: 2,384
                     
I like this. To me it does several good things.

1. It would force the UFC to declare number one contenders fights. They usually just throw them out there unofficially, but you can put just as much excitement around a number 1 contender as a title fight.

2. Unlike some, I think it would favor finishers over points fighters. Someone that lays and prays or dances around with little to no attempt to finish would have 10 more minutes to get dropped by someone who wants to end the fight. Prime example, Bisping VS. Leben... yes I know of Chris's bullshit, but think about it. Bisping flat out admitted he was out to outpoint Leben, who was clearly trying to end that fight... and I think could have.

3. I think every pay per view should have a five rounder on it. Which is why I've always pushed for a title fight on every pay per view, but this would serve just as well.


As far as the last paragraph, I hope they envoke this replay rule. A great example of that is Sodallah/Hendricks. They should have removed Mirgliblahblah and started that fight over from the time it stopped.
Good stuff, I hope it all goes through
BrianRClover is offline  
post #19 of 19 (permalink) Old 08-26-2009, 02:07 PM
Live right and every other day is a good one to die.
 
shatterproof's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: The Big Island, BC.
Posts: 1,431
                     
i'd love to see the non-title main events and superfights move to this format.


shatterproof is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the MMA Forum - UFC Forums - UFC Results - MMA Videos forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome