M-1 and Fedor Emelianenko Sue Affliction - MMA Forum - UFC Forums - UFC Results - MMA Videos
General MMA Discussion Discuss King Of The Cage, Ultimate Challenge UK, and HDNet Fights as well as general mixed martial arts discussion.

Reply

Old 11-03-2009, 07:05 PM   #1 (permalink)
You're killin me smalls
 
FiReMaN11d7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 332
FiReMaN11d7 has a brilliant futureFiReMaN11d7 has a brilliant futureFiReMaN11d7 has a brilliant futureFiReMaN11d7 has a brilliant futureFiReMaN11d7 has a brilliant futureFiReMaN11d7 has a brilliant futureFiReMaN11d7 has a brilliant futureFiReMaN11d7 has a brilliant futureFiReMaN11d7 has a brilliant futureFiReMaN11d7 has a brilliant futureFiReMaN11d7 has a brilliant future
M-1 and Fedor Emelianenko Sue Affliction

Quote:
Disclaimer: This post will detail a legal complaint. Please note that a complaint is just one side’s view of events. I will describe some of the allegations below, but I am not saying any of them are true. I am simply relaying M-1 and Fedor’s claims.

On October 28, 2009, M-1 and Fedor Emelianenko filed a lawsuit against Affliction Clothing, Affliction Entertainment, and 50 unnamed John Does in the Central District of California. The complaint states claims for breach of contract, breach of the violation of good faith and fair dealing, and declaratory relief. If they are able to join other parties, the complaint might be amended to include claims for tortuous interference with contract and related claims.

There are likely many targets among the unnamed John Does, but the UFC has to be considered the central target based on language of the complaint. After reading the complaint, it seems possible that M-1 believes the UFC was somehow involved in the cancellation of Affliction’s third show.

The complaint alleges that Strikeforce, Affliction, and M-1 reached an agreement with M-1 to allow Brett Rogers to fight Fedor Emelianenko at Affliction: Trilogy, but unbeknownst to Fedor and M-1, Affliction was simultaneously working on a renewed sponsorship deal with the UFC that would necessarily force Affliction out of the MMA promoting business. In short, the complaint alleges that Affliction was putting up a false front about searching for a replacement for Josh Barnett, and was simply buying time while they were trying to make a deal with the UFC.

The complaint alleges that Affliction kept these negotiations secret in an attempt to fool M-1 into believing they were looking for a replacement, and did not inform M-1 of its ongoing negotiations and new deal until July 24, 2009, at which point Fedor and his party of 30 had already boarded a flight from Russia to the United States.

The complaint alleges that the deal to allow Brett Rogers to fight Fedor Emelianenko on Affliction: Trilogy was completed the day before the show was cancelled, and alleges that Affliction was simultaneously pursuing two incompatible options: if the UFC deal closed they would cancel the show, and if it didn’t they would promote Brett Rogers vs. Fedor Emelianenko.

The complaint alleges that after conducting full discovery, M-1 and Fedor will amend the complaint to add “additional allegations, causes of action, and parties.”

The complaint alleges that in the run-up to Affliction: Trilogy M-1 began working on international deals to broadcast the show in Mexico, Central America, the Caribbean, South America, Eastern Europe, the United Kingdom, Australia, and elsewhere. The complaint details all of the deals M-1 entered into at length.

The complaint alleges Affliction was well aware this was going on all along and consented to it by not objecting. Because Affliction was supposedly aware of all of this, M-1 argues Affliction knew it would force M-1 to breach its contract with all of its international partners if it cancelled a show.

The complaint alleges that Todd Beard admitted to M-1 that Affliction could not and would not promote internationally, and agreed to allow M-1 to pursue all such opportunities with Affliction content. The change was not put into writing. This issue of modification appears to be a major issue of contention based on the complaint. Affliction will try to argue that M-1 changed the contract by pursuing rights not originally granted to it. If the court does not find that the contract was modified, Affliction cannot be held responsible for breach because M-1 went all over the world and did a number of international deals on their own.

In addition to the central claims described above, the complaint contains a lot of interesting information. The complaint alleges that in addition to the $300,000 fight purse, Emelianenko was paid an undisclosed sum that is not quantified in the complaint. The complaint also alleges that Affliction and M-1 Global entered into a “consulting agreement” in which Affliction paid M-1 a “substantial sum” in return for general consultant services.

The complaint alleges that Affliction and M-1 entered into an agreement in 2008 under which M-1 promised to produce a number of one-hour television episodes of “M-1 Challenge” and Affliction agreed to sponsor a number of the fighters. The terms of the deal are not disclosed. The complaint alleges that M-1 agreed to give Affliction promotional advantages relating to M-1 challenge including but not limited to use of the Affliction logo in marketing. In exchange for these promotional rights, Affliction agreed to pay M-1 a “substantial sum” that is not mentioned in the complaint.

Mark Hines, who is the lawyer representing M-1, also represented Silver Star against Affliction and Todd Beard in a state case earlier this year.

It is also worth noting that the complaint does not list Donald Trump or any of his entities as owners of Affliction Entertainment. Todd Beard is also still listed as an owner of Affliction and Affliction Entertainment in the complaint, which is contrary to prior public statements.

The big story to look at going forward is whether the UFC is eventually added as one of the Doe defendants in the complaint. The language of the complaint suggests that M-1 believes the UFC was involved in a conspiracy to convince Affliction to breach its contractual obligation to put on a third show.
http://www.bloodyelbow.com/2009/11/3...lusive-m-1-and
FiReMaN11d7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 

Old 11-04-2009, 01:04 PM   #2 (permalink)
Flyweight
 
mohod1982's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 277
mohod1982 will become famous soon enoughmohod1982 will become famous soon enoughmohod1982 will become famous soon enoughmohod1982 will become famous soon enoughmohod1982 will become famous soon enoughmohod1982 will become famous soon enough
That sounds about right...

but what are they suing for? Affliction Ent is out of business and in the red.
mohod1982 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2009, 02:26 PM   #3 (permalink)
Live right and every other day is a good one to die.
 
shatterproof's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: The Big Island, BC.
Posts: 1,431
shatterproof is on another level nowshatterproof is on another level nowshatterproof is on another level nowshatterproof is on another level nowshatterproof is on another level nowshatterproof is on another level nowshatterproof is on another level nowshatterproof is on another level nowshatterproof is on another level nowshatterproof is on another level nowshatterproof is on another level now
Quote:
The change was not put into writing. This issue of modification appears to be a major issue of contention based on the complaint.
The law is very clear on this point... you can not ammend a written contract with a verbal agreement.

Quote:
... also alleges that Affliction and M-1 Global entered into a “consulting agreement” in which Affliction paid M-1 a “substantial sum” in return for general consultant services.
Suing for your kick-back? Interesting. haha
__________________

shatterproof is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2009, 03:11 PM   #4 (permalink)
Flyweight
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 248
Light_Speed will become famous soon enoughLight_Speed will become famous soon enoughLight_Speed will become famous soon enoughLight_Speed will become famous soon enoughLight_Speed will become famous soon enoughLight_Speed will become famous soon enoughLight_Speed will become famous soon enoughLight_Speed will become famous soon enoughLight_Speed will become famous soon enoughLight_Speed will become famous soon enoughLight_Speed will become famous soon enough
lol i was watching the m-1 challenge in macedonia (sponsered by affliction) and it was sooo HORRIBLE.. it was stuff like russia vs brazil.. brazil won all the fights then russia vs germany and so on.. the fights were pretty crappy and after 3 mins most of the fighters gassed.
Light_Speed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2009, 05:27 PM   #5 (permalink)
Featherweight
 
Diokhan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Finland
Posts: 1,492
Diokhan is on another level nowDiokhan is on another level nowDiokhan is on another level nowDiokhan is on another level nowDiokhan is on another level nowDiokhan is on another level nowDiokhan is on another level nowDiokhan is on another level nowDiokhan is on another level nowDiokhan is on another level nowDiokhan is on another level now
Atleast M-1 is suing them instead of showing up at their HQ with AK-47s singing, just as likely action by those crooks. :P
__________________
"When I land that left hook, the fight will be over." -Paul Daley (He called it!)
Diokhan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2009, 05:30 PM   #6 (permalink)
Po Pimpin
 
ZENKI1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: STL
Posts: 795
ZENKI1 Is Running Through The RankingsZENKI1 Is Running Through The RankingsZENKI1 Is Running Through The RankingsZENKI1 Is Running Through The RankingsZENKI1 Is Running Through The RankingsZENKI1 Is Running Through The RankingsZENKI1 Is Running Through The RankingsZENKI1 Is Running Through The RankingsZENKI1 Is Running Through The RankingsZENKI1 Is Running Through The RankingsZENKI1 Is Running Through The Rankings
Dana White is gonna end up with radiation poisoning.
__________________
ZENKI1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On

VerticalSports
Baseball Forum Golf Forum Boxing Forum Snowmobile Forum
Basketball Forum Soccer Forum MMA Forum PWC Forum
Football Forum Cricket Forum Wrestling Forum ATV Forum
Hockey Forum Volleyball Forum Paintball Forum Snowboarding Forum
Tennis Forum Rugby Forums Lacrosse Forum Skiing Forums
Copyright (C) Verticalscope Inc SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2
Powered by vBulletin Copyright © 2000-2009 Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
vBCredits v1.4 Copyright ©2007, PixelFX Studios