Something needs to be implemented to stop Blanketing - Page 3 - MMA Forum - UFC Forums - UFC Results - MMA Videos
General MMA Discussion Discuss King Of The Cage, Ultimate Challenge UK, and HDNet Fights as well as general mixed martial arts discussion.

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #21 of 27 (permalink) Old 08-29-2010, 09:14 PM
Woodenhead's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 2,069
One man's LnP is another man's technical fight. I'd rather the ref lay 'em down if they don't throw a strike after 20 seconds.


Also, regarding this topic:

Woodenhead is offline  
Sponsored Links
post #22 of 27 (permalink) Old 08-29-2010, 09:26 PM
MMA Fanatic
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 100
Originally Posted by nonamehero View Post
Basically you have to be a better wrestler than your opponents to counter him.....

This is like saying in Shaq's prime, if he was allowed to camp in the key, you can still defend him
1. be stronger than him, move him out of the key
2. foul him, he cant shoot free throws
3. shoot 3 pointers, so that it is worth one more point than his dunk
4. triple team him
5. dont let him catch the ball

hell, even with 3 secs rule, Shaq still dominated.
... i'm glad you added that last line about shaq.. i'm confused why it is someone elses job to make the fight "fair" for someone with lesser physical attributes and/or abilities.

shaq was an absolute monster with or without the 3 second rule. the onus falls on the defending team to deal with his size/skill set just as it falls on the fighters to be able to handle their opponents strengths.

what if the situation was flipped and wrestlers could never get their opponent to the ground because their tdd was too strong? would that be any less "fair" because their opponent negated their strengths in the cage effectively? would we be having discussions about how "<insert name here> take down defense is unfairly strong and negating part of the MIXED in MMA.. so we need to only stand for 20 second intervals and then the refs will start them on the ground?"

its silly. sorry people who think wrestling is boring. i know its not thrilling to watch, but its effective and i think it's going to eventually teach the fighters to become more well rounded.

oh and in reference to the notion that there is nothing to do to stop wrestlers, please go watch the anthony pettis vs shane roller fight from wec 50. it was a clinic.
TheCleeM is offline  
post #23 of 27 (permalink) Old 08-29-2010, 09:30 PM
Light Heavyweight
Danm2501's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Manchester, UK
Posts: 3,440
I have no problem with the guys that are serious takedown artists, that take guys down, dominate them, land punches and try for submissions but what I don't like is "Wall and Stall". Nik Lentz's performance against Andre Winner was one of the dullest I've ever seen. He was just holding Andre against the cage, grabbing onto Andre's legs, and was allowed to just hold him there. It wasn't until Andre tired in the 3rd that Lentz was actually able to do anything noteworthy. Something definitely has to be done about that gameplan, it's not remotely entertaining.

Proudly Supporting
Dan Hardy
Conor McGregor
Michael Bisping
Donald Cerrone
Chael Sonnen
Demetrious Johnson
Joe Lauzon
Nick Diaz
Danm2501 is offline  
post #24 of 27 (permalink) Old 08-29-2010, 10:33 PM
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,099
Danm, I don't think that is a fair comparison.

This is after-all, albeit martial arts, a form of fighting.

A wrestler who couldn't get a striker down, would be having damage done to him.

A wrestler who is simply LnPing on top of another man, is not doing any damage and hence, should not be rewarded as they are doing no damage.

There is a term applied in the scoring methods in boxing for things like this, it's called 'effective aggression'. You can't be rewarded for outworking a guy, if you aren't doing any damage.

Wrestlers should simply be more active and use more GnP, nothing wrong with them using their superior wrestling, as long as they are using it effectively!
Fine Wine is offline  
post #25 of 27 (permalink) Old 08-29-2010, 10:52 PM
The Title Guy
kantowrestler's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Orange, California
Posts: 14,324
Yeah that happened way back when with Coleman!

The Emoticon Guy
kantowrestler is offline  
post #26 of 27 (permalink) Old 08-30-2010, 02:39 AM
MMA Fanatic
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 15
The best way to stop LnP is by changing the scoring system. Do not reward fighters who just lay on their opponent. If there is no reward, fighters will look for alternatives to win.

Fighter A spends a good 1 minute striking with Fighter B. Fighter B begins to loose the striking game so shoots for a takedown. Fighter A pulls guard and holds Fighter B. Fighter B spends the rest of the round laying on Fighter A, avoiding being stood up by the ref by throwing the odd punch. The judges should now score the fight to what exactly happened. Fighter A outstiked Fighter B landing say 20/25 punches. B only lands 12/15 punches and B gets one takedown. Fighter A wins round one.

Now to be honest of not 100% sure on how judges judge fights but it seems they look at who dominated the fight alot more then who actaully inflicted damage. If Fighter A worked harder in the fight then Fighter B, Fighter A should be awarded the victory.

With a change to the scoring system it will not get rid of Lay N Pray but it will make it a very unattractive option to win a fight with.
Tweak is offline  
post #27 of 27 (permalink) Old 08-30-2010, 03:47 AM
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,099
Yes, very good points Tweak.
Fine Wine is offline  

Quick Reply

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the MMA Forum - UFC Forums - UFC Results - MMA Videos forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:


Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On

For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome