sherdog fight finder vs other websites
edit: How accurate is sherdog fight finder? I found another site mixedmartialarts.com according to which certain undefeated fighters on sherdog have losses on it, or have most of their fights as amateur.
|
Some Times Wikedia Figthing Is More Acurate
|
I believe that wikipedia is the most reliable of the bunch because they are the most heavily and regularly monitored and edited. databases like Sherdog and mixedmartialarts.com are updated rapidly with new info (and thus make great original sources) but mistakes take forever to fix, if ever, while wikipedia editors continually examine conflicting sources and are pretty good at figuring out who made the error and getting the data right.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
But for MMA it's pretty safe. People don't often bother to make boring vandalizations, when they do they tend to be silly and obvious and get caught very quickly by editors. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
sherdog is like a cheap brothel, you go there for fun and hope to god you don't take anything with you when you leave.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
wikipedia is primarily good for rumors. i was looking at some undefeated fighters with 7-0 or 10-0 records on sherdog (stats- best record overall) and when i looked up more info on these fighters i found out actually half their fights were amateur or they had losses on their records that were not included. that gives them a false aura of invincibility and i dont understand why sherdog doesnt fix it. |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:39 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.8 , Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2