sherdog fight finder vs other websites - MMA Forum - UFC Forums - UFC Results - MMA Videos
General MMA Discussion Discuss King Of The Cage, Ultimate Challenge UK, and HDNet Fights as well as general mixed martial arts discussion.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #1 of 17 (permalink) Old 11-05-2010, 12:39 AM Thread Starter
Bantamweight
 
UFC86's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 982
                     
sherdog fight finder vs other websites

edit: How accurate is sherdog fight finder? I found another site mixedmartialarts.com according to which certain undefeated fighters on sherdog have losses on it, or have most of their fights as amateur.

Last edited by UFC86; 01-21-2013 at 10:36 AM.
UFC86 is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 17 (permalink) Old 11-05-2010, 01:13 AM
MMA Fanatic
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 25
                     
Some Times Wikedia Figthing Is More Acurate
wiwi07 is offline  
post #3 of 17 (permalink) Old 11-05-2010, 01:21 AM
I Finish Threads
 
HexRei's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 8,916
                     
I believe that wikipedia is the most reliable of the bunch because they are the most heavily and regularly monitored and edited. databases like Sherdog and mixedmartialarts.com are updated rapidly with new info (and thus make great original sources) but mistakes take forever to fix, if ever, while wikipedia editors continually examine conflicting sources and are pretty good at figuring out who made the error and getting the data right.

Everybody good, plenty of slaves for my robot colony?
HexRei is online now  
post #4 of 17 (permalink) Old 11-05-2010, 01:24 AM
Dexter Morgan
 
Intermission's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 5,754
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by HexRei View Post
I believe that wikipedia is the most reliable of the bunch because they are the most heavily and regularly monitored and edited. databases like Sherdog and mixedmartialarts.com are updated rapidly with new info (and thus make great original sources) but mistakes take forever to fix, if ever, while wikipedia editors continually examine conflicting sources and are pretty good at figuring out who made the error and getting the data right.
I learned in school that Wikipedia is the single worst website you could ever put on the bibliography because of how openly edited it is. However, in terms of MMA I agree that is is the MOST reliable website.

Intermission is offline  
post #5 of 17 (permalink) Old 11-05-2010, 01:30 AM
I Finish Threads
 
HexRei's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 8,916
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by Intermission View Post
I learned in school that Wikipedia is the single worst website you could ever put on the bibliography because of how openly edited it is. However, in terms of MMA I agree that is is the MOST reliable website.
Yeah, it's a bad idea to use wikipedia as a source. Use it as a database (for which it is amazing and nothing else like it exists), and then drill down into the sources it cites, and use those Even a textbook is only as good as it's sources.

But for MMA it's pretty safe. People don't often bother to make boring vandalizations, when they do they tend to be silly and obvious and get caught very quickly by editors.

Everybody good, plenty of slaves for my robot colony?
HexRei is online now  
post #6 of 17 (permalink) Old 11-05-2010, 01:31 AM
Dexter Morgan
 
Intermission's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 5,754
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by HexRei View Post
Yeah, it's a bad idea to use wikipedia as a source. Use it as a database (for which it is amazing and nothing else like it exists), and then drill down into the sources it cites, and use those
I have NEVER done that before

Intermission is offline  
post #7 of 17 (permalink) Old 11-05-2010, 01:33 AM
I Finish Threads
 
HexRei's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 8,916
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by Intermission View Post
I have NEVER done that before
oh me neither

Everybody good, plenty of slaves for my robot colony?
HexRei is online now  
post #8 of 17 (permalink) Old 11-05-2010, 01:53 AM
The Forum Drunk
 
xeberus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 9,450
                     
sherdog is like a cheap brothel, you go there for fun and hope to god you don't take anything with you when you leave.



If a law is unjust, a man is not only right to disobey it, he is obligated to do so. ~ Thomas Jefferson


Sig by D.P.



xeberus is offline  
post #9 of 17 (permalink) Old 11-05-2010, 07:07 AM
Middleweight
 
Couchwarrior's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: the couch
Posts: 2,689
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by HexRei View Post
I believe that wikipedia is the most reliable of the bunch because they are the most heavily and regularly monitored and edited. databases like Sherdog and mixedmartialarts.com are updated rapidly with new info (and thus make great original sources) but mistakes take forever to fix, if ever, while wikipedia editors continually examine conflicting sources and are pretty good at figuring out who made the error and getting the data right.
When it comes to fight records, it seems most if not all Wikipedia articles use Sherdog as their only source.

Last edited by Couchwarrior; 11-05-2010 at 07:09 AM.
Couchwarrior is offline  
post #10 of 17 (permalink) Old 11-05-2010, 01:46 PM Thread Starter
Bantamweight
 
UFC86's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 982
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by Intermission View Post
I learned in school that Wikipedia is the single worst website you could ever put on the bibliography because of how openly edited it is. However, in terms of MMA I agree that is is the MOST reliable website.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Couchwarrior View Post
When it comes to fight records, it seems most if not all Wikipedia articles use Sherdog as their only source.
QFT on both!

wikipedia is primarily good for rumors.

i was looking at some undefeated fighters with 7-0 or 10-0 records on sherdog (stats- best record overall) and when i looked up more info on these fighters i found out actually half their fights were amateur or they had losses on their records that were not included. that gives them a false aura of invincibility and i dont understand why sherdog doesnt fix it.
UFC86 is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the MMA Forum - UFC Forums - UFC Results - MMA Videos forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome