I obviously think he can say what he wants. He can criticize Barnett and vice versa. Someone can post and criticism one of them, then get criticized by other posters. All good.
But I do have to admit, that when I think about it, a guy who has been found to have cheated by using horse steroids to increase his performance in beating the shit out of someone, is calling someone "a filthy person" over his failure to exchange pleasantries in passing social situations.
That is kind of weird.
Some people think that they can convey either a philosophy on life or a complex political statement using a signature on the internet. I'm not one of them.
Last edited by SmackyBear; 05-17-2011 at 11:49 PM.
Reason: Avoid double post