Gi or no Gi? - MMA Forum - UFC Forums - UFC Results - MMA Videos
Grappling Technique Grappling discussion area.

View Poll Results: Gi or No GI?
Gi 7 43.75%
No Gi 9 56.25%
Voters: 16. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #1 of 31 (permalink) Old 02-11-2009, 12:23 PM Thread Starter
Sexy as F
 
Evil Ira's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Tyne and Wear, UK
Posts: 2,044
                     
Gi or no Gi?

Which is more effective style of BJJ?


Quote:
Originally Posted by Evil Ira View Post
Top Five Ways to paper cut your balls.
Quote:
Originally Posted by name goes here View Post
4 trying to teach your willy to read
Evil Ira is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 31 (permalink) Old 02-11-2009, 12:34 PM
Flyweight
 
Tango87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 370
                     
They are both effective but there are more options with a Gi. Also I think anytime you call it BJJ it's considered to be Gi. no Gi is starting to be more commonly referred to as "Submission Grappling" or "Submission wrestling"

I know that anytime I hear Brazilian Jiu Jitsu I usually think "Gi" but it may not be the same for everyone.
Tango87 is offline  
post #3 of 31 (permalink) Old 02-11-2009, 12:34 PM
"Leak Bros"
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Grand Rapids, Michigan
Posts: 343
                     
In what? Lol. Like a street fight? I don't know many people who would wear a gi in a street fight lol. It all depends, if one person has the gi, and another person doesn't. The person who doesn't would have the Advantage, because there are like 10x more submissions with the Gi. All kinds of collar chokes and stuff.

Your question is kind of weird, because there isn't one that is inherently better than the other. Its simply a matter of what you like better. Personally I prefer no-gi. But I know a lot of people who like Gi.

Edit: To above poster. I don't think you can consider No-Gi to be submission wrestling. Most of the sweeps and subs that occur in No-Gi are BJJ based.

Favorite Fighters: Fedor, Karo Parisyan, Nate Marquardt, Demian Maia and now Jon Jones

Superman55 is offline  
post #4 of 31 (permalink) Old 02-11-2009, 12:50 PM
www.toezup.com
 
ToeZup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 2,189
                     
I have always looked at it like this. If you plan on moving on to mixed martial arts fighting then it's better to practice with no gi. If you want to stay fighting in BJJ matches and grappling tournaments then it's best to practice with a gi. So it's all about what your future plans are.

If you are going to do both then practice with no gi because it's easy to get used the the different moves you can execute with a gi on like tango hinted at.

ToeZup is offline  
post #5 of 31 (permalink) Old 02-11-2009, 01:40 PM
Das ‹bermensch
 
wukkadb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 7,633
                     
IMO the Gi is much more helpful than not having it. The Gi teaches you to be a lot more technical, and to pay attention to small details. No-gi is better for wrestlers and athletic guys for sure. In real life the Gi resembles a jacket so it's very applicable to real life.




What a stud

Quote:
Originally Posted by swpthleg View Post
The power of Aleks, his small baby and pimp hardcore dogs has granted you useful insight, my friend.
wukkadb is offline  
post #6 of 31 (permalink) Old 02-11-2009, 04:00 PM
Flyweight
 
Tango87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 370
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by Superman55 View Post
Edit: To above poster. I don't think you can consider No-Gi to be submission wrestling. Most of the sweeps and subs that occur in No-Gi are BJJ based.
I don't consider it submission wrestling. I wrote:

Quote:
no Gi is starting to be more commonly referred to as "Submission Grappling" or "Submission wrestling"
Just correcting you. Thanks.
Tango87 is offline  
post #7 of 31 (permalink) Old 02-11-2009, 07:35 PM
Thug Life
 
Suvaco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 4,345
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by wukkadb View Post
IMO the Gi is much more helpful than not having it. The Gi teaches you to be a lot more technical, and to pay attention to small details. No-gi is better for wrestlers and athletic guys for sure. In real life the Gi resembles a jacket so it's very applicable to real life.
I like training no-gi better, but I'm glad I trained gi almost exclusively until now because it slows down the game and made me more technical than people who only train without the gi. Even when I roll no-gi, my game is pretty similar to my gi game. I play pretty slow and methodical. I can't do the crazy shit that athletic BJJ guys like Cobrinha can do, so I just like to control people and wait until they make a mistake.
Suvaco is offline  
post #8 of 31 (permalink) Old 02-11-2009, 07:46 PM
"Leak Bros"
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Grand Rapids, Michigan
Posts: 343
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tango87 View Post
I don't consider it submission wrestling. I wrote:



Just correcting you. Thanks.
Ahh, even then, I still disagree, I don't think I have ever heard anyone call no-gi BJJ, Submission grappling or wrestling. Oh well, maybe its something they say in other parts of the country

Favorite Fighters: Fedor, Karo Parisyan, Nate Marquardt, Demian Maia and now Jon Jones

Superman55 is offline  
post #9 of 31 (permalink) Old 02-11-2009, 08:16 PM
Flyweight
 
Tango87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 370
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by Superman55 View Post
Ahh, even then, I still disagree, I don't think I have ever heard anyone call no-gi BJJ, Submission grappling or wrestling. Oh well, maybe its something they say in other parts of the country
Ah, that could be the case... Yeah for the most part people do refer to it was one or the other. Google Submission wrestling or grappling and you'll see lol. Let's agree to disagree and just call it "grappling"
Tango87 is offline  
post #10 of 31 (permalink) Old 02-11-2009, 08:18 PM
Flyweight
 
Tango87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 370
                     
I don't see how people can say that No-Gi is more effective than Gi? Gi encompasses everything from No-gi... AND THEN SOME!!! Any move you can do in No-Gi can be done in Gi but not every move you can do in Gi can be done in No-Gi...

I'm flabbergasted
Tango87 is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the MMA Forum - UFC Forums - UFC Results - MMA Videos forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome