Kind of a sexist question and its kind of a silly one to boot.
Why wouldn't there be a circumstance that hitting a woman is justified?
I mean who would believe that no circumstance exists that would justify violence
Being female doesn't give you an inherent right to physical safety regardless of your actions...
I would try to do so in a way that does not hurt her to much though....
Stop her from hurting me rather than do damage, unlike if it was a guy attacking me
He gets my thai clinch.
I think a lot of guys feel like this and I understand, hell how often do you come into contact with a woman you cant beat up and then have to fight that woman?
But for me it's too dangerous to assume that I can easily restrain a woman. You can chuckle at that but Ive seen guys that could have ended a confrontation quickly get royally smashed to shit because they were trying to minimize damage and ended up just taking all the damage.
Sometimes by the time you grasp the seriousness of a situation its already too late to do something to overt it so I take every act of violence seriously. I also dont do anything to anyone that would justify violence so if a woman comes at me I would assume she's dangerous, has a weapon or is just bat shit crazy.
Im not saying I would drop my wife for slapping me in a heated argument or that you should always meet violence with kind but there are just too many variables.
"I fear no man, but Jim Harrison and Mike Stone are the two last men that I would wish to meet in an alley fight. Jim Harrison's fighting style is not flamboyant or spectacular, it's just simple and deadly!" - Bruce Lee sakurabushidokan.homestead.com