Thread Tools

Display Modes

**yorT** · 10-05-2008, 01:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by byukid

So why is, say, shooting a moose inherently less wrong than stomping a cat? I really don't condone either behavior. It just seems that being shot is maybe less graphic.

See, the reason people don't like this specifically is because of it's graphic nature. If someone had been, say, shooting cats, we'd be mad but I doubt there would be calls for death.

I just think it's interesting. I do think what she did was disgusting though.

The way they kill moose is humane. What she did to that kitten was in-humane.

TheNegation · 10-05-2008, 02:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by yorT

The way they kill moose is humane. What she did to that kitten was in-humane.

No it isn't, getting shot isn't humane at all.

Quote:

Originally Posted by MJB23

Shooting a moose is completely different then someone stomping on a kitten. Moose populations in northern states and Canada can become out of control if we didn't hunt. There is a huge deer overpopulation problem in New England because they lowered the limits and now the deer are everywhere. It leads to them getting hit by cars and stuff.

Thats a load of shit. Populations don't go mad and get out of control if we don't hunt. Thats the same bullshit people who foxhunt try to spread here. It simply isn't true, populations are controlled by a species resources.

byukid · 10-05-2008, 02:11 PM

Okay, you people know that moose was just an example, right? There are other animals that we hunt.

I'm just saying, hunting is just as cruel as this. If you don't have a problem with hunting, you shouldn't have a problem with this. Killing animals is killing animals is killing animals. Just because you wouldn't do it doesn't make it not killing animals.

bail3yz · 10-05-2008, 02:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by byukid

So why is, say, shooting a moose inherently less wrong than stomping a cat? I really don't condone either behavior. It just seems that being shot is maybe less graphic.

See, the reason people don't like this specifically is because of it's graphic nature. If someone had been, say, shooting cats, we'd be mad but I doubt there would be calls for death.

I just think it's interesting. I do think what she did was disgusting though.

Quote:

Originally Posted by yorT

The way they kill moose is humane. What she did to that kitten was in-humane.

Exactly

Quote:

Originally Posted by byukid

Okay, you people know that moose was just an example, right? There are other animals that we hunt.

I'm just saying, hunting is just as cruel as this. If you don't have a problem with hunting, you shouldn't have a problem with this. Killing animals is killing animals is killing animals. Just because you wouldn't do it doesn't make it not killing animals.

Shooting an animal dead asap and stomping ones eyes out with the heels of your shoes... are a bit different.

Also hunting other animals have a purpose, she was killing these cats for no reason... (well she had a reason.. to sell videos.. no real reason).

TheNegation · 10-05-2008, 02:28 PM

Lol, where is the guarantee you are going to kill an animal asap?

It's the same thing. You are killing an animal for pleasure.

Hunting doesn't serve a practical purpose. Also this did have a purpose, she was promoting a website. Didn't you read the article? Ah, didn't see that in your post, or you edited it in, sorry.

bail3yz · 10-05-2008, 02:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheNegation

Lol, where is the guarantee you are going to kill an animal asap?

It's the same thing. You are killing an animal for pleasure.

Hunting doesn't serve a practical purpose. Also this did have a purpose, she was promoting a website. Didn't you read the article? Ah, didn't see that in your post, or you edited it in, sorry.

I didnt edit it in, it was always there.

Theres no guarantee, but its what most hunters intentions are.

And there are practical reasons for hunting... lol at me having to explain this.

EDIT: its probably more humane to let a deer live its life.. then hunt it for food.. then it is to buy meat that was from an animal that lived its entire life on a farm (have you ever seen how pigs, chickens, and other animals live on a farm?). So unless you guys dont ever eat meat, you should get off your high horses.

TheNegation · 10-05-2008, 02:36 PM

Such as? If you aren't living in the freaking middle of a forest in deepest Alaska, there really are not. The vast majority of people who hunt don't need to.

What are you retarded? Maybe we should, geez, I don't know, look at improving regulations so that animals on farms are treated better?

I buy my eggs free range, I aint getting off this thing at all.

Couchwarrior · 10-05-2008, 03:36 PM

Stephen Lynch approves: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oOfb9...eature=related

dontazo · 10-05-2008, 04:13 PM

hunting and stomping a cat is different IMO
i am against illegal hunting though..
fishing rulz!

**yorT** · 10-05-2008, 05:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheNegation

No it isn't, getting shot isn't humane at all.

Thats a load of shit. Populations don't go mad and get out of control if we don't hunt. Thats the same bullshit people who foxhunt try to spread here. It simply isn't true, populations are controlled by a species resources.

It is more humane than stomping on one's eye with a high heel.

Yeah, lets not control the nutria population in Louisiana:
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/m..._16881083/pg_1

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheNegation

Lol, where is the guarantee you are going to kill an animal asap?

It's the same thing. You are killing an animal for pleasure.

Hunting doesn't serve a practical purpose. Also this did have a purpose, she was promoting a website. Didn't you read the article? Ah, didn't see that in your post, or you edited it in, sorry.

Hunting doesn't serve a practical purpose but what she did, did serve a purpose?

People hunt for meat. How is that not practical?