[K R Y]

[Life B Ez]

Originally Posted by K R Y

Gotta love stupid Christians.

Sent from my Desire HD using VerticalSports.Com App

[xxpillowxxjp]

Originally Posted by Life B Ez

Gotta love stupid Christians.

Sent from my Desire HD using VerticalSports.Com App

Whaaaaaaaaa? This just made you sound very ignorant.. and stupid yourself.

1. What did any of their remarks have to do with Christianity?

2. What Christian believes the world has only existed for 2012 years?




idk, maybe I got lost somewhere but I am terribly confuzzled.


EDIT : Now im thinking you were trying to make someone rage! =( if so, you got me, i applaud you sir

[Life B Ez]

Originally Posted by xxpillowxxjp

Whaaaaaaaaa? This just made you sound very ignorant.. and stupid yourself.

1. What did any of their remarks have to do with Christianity?

2. What Christian believes the world has only existed for 2012 years?




idk, maybe I got lost somewhere but I am terribly confuzzled.


EDIT : Now im thinking you were trying to make someone rage! =( if so, you got me, i applaud you sir

Well to be far I could say that because the 2012 year is based on Christian beliefs marking time with Jesus' life blah blah blah. And I'm pretty sure there is a large group of chirstians that believe the entire earth is only a few thousand years old.

But I read the first page and seen people saying they hope it doesn't turn into a religion bashing thread and couldn't help it.

Sent from my Desire HD using VerticalSports.Com App

[Hawndo]

I think Creationist Christians believe the world is like 15,000 years old or something, not 2012. They are just morons.

[Life B Ez]

Originally Posted by Hawndo

I think Creationist Christians believe the world is like 15,000 years old or something, not 2012. They are just morons.

It's way less than that, more like 3000 I think.

Edit we were both wrong, they think its between 6000 and 10,000.
Sent from my Desire HD using VerticalSports.Com App

[M.C]

It's 6,000 normally, as they have never heard of fossils.

Anywho, I have something to post in here, it's about a guy beating on some kid and getting away with it, I can't for the life of me find the link to it, though, and that alone is making me RAGE.

[xxpillowxxjp]

Originally Posted by M.C

It's 6,000 normally, as they have never heard of fossils.

Anywho, I have something to post in here, it's about a guy beating on some kid and getting away with it, I can't for the life of me find the link to it, though, and that alone is making me RAGE.

Actually, the method they use to find out the age of the fossils is by the layer of Earth its found in. And guess how they decide which age each layer declares what's found in it? By the fossils in them...

[M.C]

Originally Posted by xxpillowxxjp

Actually, the method they use to find out the age of the fossils is by the layer of Earth its found in. And guess how they decide which age each layer declares what's found in it? By the fossils in them...

There are multiple ways to tell how old a fossil is, one of which is extremely, pin-point accurate to almost the exact year, if not the exact year itself. It does involve which layer of earth it's in, which is a radiometric test.

Also, there are a vast amount of different tests with multiple styles and types of radiometric dating and ways we know how old the earth is, and it has very little to do with fossils. It has to do with clocks and timers we use regarding the decay of substances within materials in the Earth. Whomever told you Earth's age is based on fossils needs to get their face into a science book and out of the bible fiction.

We use this information on the age of the Earth and these tests to determine the age of things, including Fossils, which are pin-point accurate, many of which are millions of years old. As the great Lewis Black once said, take a Fossil, show it to a Christian, if they don't get it - throw it over their head.

[xxpillowxxjp]

Originally Posted by M.C

There are multiple ways to tell how old a fossil is, one of which is extremely, pin-point accurate to almost the exact year, if not the exact year itself. It does involve which layer of earth it's in, which is a radiometric test.

Also, there are a vast amount of different tests with multiple styles and types of radiometric dating and ways we know how old the earth is, and it has very little to do with fossils. It has to do with clocks and timers we use regarding the decay of substances within materials in the Earth. Whomever told you Earth's age is based on fossils needs to get their face into a science book and out of the bible fiction.

We use this information on the age of the Earth and these tests to determine the age of things, including Fossils, which are pin-point accurate, many of which are millions of years old. As the great Lewis Black once said, take a Fossil, show it to a Christian, if they don't get it - throw it over their head.

I mean i could use the same argument against an evolutionist theory on how old the Earth is. If the Moon moves away from the Earth 2 to 3 inches every year, which if you use the same carbon dating principles they use for fossils, you assume it has been doing the same thing since "the beginning of time", which if the earth is 20 billion years old, it simply wouldn't add up. When they say these fossils existed (4 billion years ago is as far as they have dated back), the tides would have been so strong the earth would have been inhabitable. Same rule can be applied to the sun who's is getting 5 inches smaller every hour, which if the Earth is 20 billion years old, it would have not been inhabitable. But if you believe the Earth is 6-10 thousand years old, as a creationist does, then those factors would not make a unlivable effect.



We are obviously violating the threads rules but I'd like to make it clear that though my faith is in creation and not evolution i do acknowledge the fact that either way you have to believe that either God came from nothing and has always existed or that mass/energy has always existed and came from nothing. You can not argue the quantum theory against a creationist because any "law" such as it or gravity would have been put into existence by a creator that created the world. If you are interested in learning about creationism and the FACTS (That don't rely on the Bible) I can show you some videos that are highly extensive and argue all points of creation vs evolution.