Lets bump this.
IMO chuck is a bad match up for shogun and wandy. Both of these guys have suspect chins and have a very wild style. Chucks right hand would eventually find its mark, and i think we all know what happens if it lands on shogun or wand. Of course, wand and shogun def. have the tools to beat chuck, but they have to execute there gameplans better. If they come in swinging, chucks gonna KO them.
Now onto why I think jackson will beat chuck again. Rampage is a very crisp boxer, with good combonations, alot of power, and is very good at blocking punches. His main strengh, of course, is his slams and GnP, witch he executed perfectly vs chuck the first time. Chucks TD is great, but if rampage wears him out with punches or in the clinch like the first time, jackson will slam him. Jackson also has arguably the best chin in his weight class, only being KO'd by wandy's/shogun's knees (witch im sure hit as hard as chucks right, plus he took ALOT of them). You could argue that jackson hasnt looked the same in a while, but imo alot of that is overexaggerated, jackson's performance is really dependent on his opponent. On the other hand, many people argue that chucks gotten better, witch, besides his footwork, I havent seen to much of. I mean, lets look at some facts, Tito (who is easily inferior to rampage chinwise) took chuck 3 rounds. He was in trouble a couple times, but he recovered the first time, and the next time was a very controversial stoppage. If tito can go toe to toe with chuck with those results, so can rampage, and most likley with even better results. Chucks cardio is less then stellar, but rampage has shown that he can go the distance. Bottom line is that jackson is the worst match up for chuck at LHW, and if both of these guys show up healthy, rampage is walking out with the belt.