Originally Posted by Soakked
Has it been proven that he killed the animal for eating? If it's just for sport then your point is moot.
The act of killing just for the sake of killing is just plain wrong, don't know how anyone could say otherwise. That does not apply to hunters that hunt their food which is certainly more humane than the agri-business crap that we have for everyone's convenience.
At least Brock eats his kills, because to do otherwise is to have no respect for the animal and no respect for life in general.
Bobcats aren't hunted for food. They are hunted to control the population because they are a nuisance and expense to farmers. Their fur is valuable. Ever own any fur?
I only showed the videos and mentioned KFC to make my point that except for the true vegetarians (how many we got?) this thread is full of hypocritical nancy boys.
dead is dead. Killing is killing. That Bobcat has no preference on whether he is eaten or skinned for his pelt or stuffed.
I used to hunt. Then I spent awhile hunting with a camera. I don't like to kill anything anymore it's just an excuse to be in the woods. But it is part of our nature as much as liking sex. Some people feel the urge to hunt as much as you feel the urge to breed. It comes from the same place and one is as wrong as the other.
People who express shock and disgust at this before they go to the fridge and make a cold cut sandwich are funny.
And maybe a little sheltered.