Escrima hand checking - MMA Forum - UFC Forums - UFC Results - MMA Videos
Standup Technique MMA Standup fighting techniques.

Reply

Old 06-23-2007, 04:35 PM   #1 (permalink)
Kin
MMA fighter
 
Kin's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Boston, Massachusetts
Posts: 627
Kin Is Beloved By AllKin Is Beloved By AllKin Is Beloved By AllKin Is Beloved By AllKin Is Beloved By AllKin Is Beloved By AllKin Is Beloved By AllKin Is Beloved By AllKin Is Beloved By AllKin Is Beloved By AllKin Is Beloved By All
Escrima hand checking

In my grappling/MMA class, yesterday, the main instructors were out. So, the boxing instructor gave us a free class. He was also versed in the arts of Kempo and Escrima. A concept that he showed us, which really caught my interest, was the usage of hand-checks to open up more time for counter attacks or closing distance. Mind you, this concept applies only for hand attacks aimed at your head.

If attacked by a straight punch, he would have me first declect the punch like in boxing. Rather than cross-blocking ( reaching across my body to block his left with my left or vice versa ), we would use the hand on the same side of the oncoming blow (from defender's perspective) and pat the outside of the attacking forearm to the inside. A body lean and slight sidestep are to accompany the deflection. This motion alone redirects the punch adequately. It's nothing special, and nothing that someone with boxing training hasn't already seen or learned.

Now, the second part of this overall technique is what most will find more alien. Remaining LOOSE, you then move your other hand ( the one that hadn't parried) in a brief circular motion. It will go down, so as to pass below the punch, then raise back up to check the arm. By driving the second hand against the elbow and pushing it across the opponents body, you secure that arm. The most important thing to keep in mind, though, is that the checking hand has to do its job within a split second after the parrying hand. If you're too slow, the whole thing is pointless.

But, on the other hand, I'd like to talk about the results. If successful, and you're practically pinning their hand across their own body, you gain over a whole second of time to do whatever the heck you want. While their arm is checked, they can't shift their shoulders/hips for a second punch, they can't drop levels and shoot... They're essentially imobolized for a brief instance.

There's also a variation for wide hooks/haymakers. Rather than moving to the outside, like with a straight punch, you step to their inside and cross-block. So, if a haymaker hook is coming for your left, you use your right to block. Similar to the previous situation, the opposite one will come under and check the attacking limb. This one seems less versatile, though, as all you seem to be able to do is unwind a backfist, then follow the motion into a cross with the checking hand.

Considering the intricacy of these movements, being loose and quick is obviously key -- that and timing the body positioning, footwork, parry, and hand-check to work in harmony.

Anyway, I was just wondering what people thought, and if anyone had seen any of this stuff before.
Kin is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 

Old 06-26-2007, 03:29 PM   #2 (permalink)
Outta My Head
 
Onganju's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Paramount, CA
Posts: 1,220
Blog Entries: 11
Onganju is on another level nowOnganju is on another level nowOnganju is on another level nowOnganju is on another level nowOnganju is on another level nowOnganju is on another level nowOnganju is on another level nowOnganju is on another level nowOnganju is on another level nowOnganju is on another level nowOnganju is on another level now
The system of checking in Escrima/Arnis differentiates from the standard chi sao hands of many chinese styles (Kung Fu, Wing Chun, Tai Chi, etc) in that it is based off of a weapons fighting style. Its roots and principles were built with the reference that your opponent would be armed (with a stick, knife, sword, etc) when you're attacked. This is the reason why a lot of subtle footwork is incorporated during the defense of attacks (it moves your body completely away from the path of attack while you defend with own weapon and check with your free hand). In regards to chi sao, the practices were done with an unarmed reference in mind and could be practiced with static footwork.

Funny thing about this is that I've spent a bit of time over the last few months looking into the history of the Fillipino martial arts and we've been going through a lot of trapping and disarming techniques at my classes lately, so a lot of the why's and wherefore's on this subject is very fresh in my mind. I could probably go in for a while about this. I will say this, to be able to get really good at this takes a long while. However, even just incorporating the bits I've filed away in my mind, it can frustrate the hell out of an opponent.

Bruce Lee was taught the Fillipino martial arts by Dan Inosanto, and he incorporated the checking systems of Escrima with those he had learned from the styles of Kung Fu he already knew. As a result, many of those that sparred with him have openly stated that he had this uncanny knack of defending in a way that left them totally defenseless (Chuck Norris had actually said this about Lee in an old issue of Black Belt magazine). His trapping and checking systems actually progressed into the budding grappling skills he wanted to incorporate into JKD. Unfortunately, he never got that far.
__________________
It doesn't matter if you agree or disagree... As long as I don't bore you and I spark a moment of thought, my goal is achieved.

Queng leon queng tigre ecu tacacut, queca pa? - Pampangan Mandarigma Motto

My Blog <--READ IT!
Onganju is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2007, 01:01 PM   #3 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Lincolnshire, England
Posts: 51
Regiment has a little shameless behaviour in the past
Quote:
Originally Posted by Onganju
The system of checking in Escrima/Arnis differentiates from the standard chi sao hands of many chinese styles (Kung Fu, Wing Chun, Tai Chi, etc) in that it is based off of a weapons fighting style. Its roots and principles were built with the reference that your opponent would be armed (with a stick, knife, sword, etc) when you're attacked. This is the reason why a lot of subtle footwork is incorporated during the defense of attacks (it moves your body completely away from the path of attack while you defend with own weapon and check with your free hand). In regards to chi sao, the practices were done with an unarmed reference in mind and could be practiced with static footwork.

Funny thing about this is that I've spent a bit of time over the last few months looking into the history of the Fillipino martial arts and we've been going through a lot of trapping and disarming techniques at my classes lately, so a lot of the why's and wherefore's on this subject is very fresh in my mind. I could probably go in for a while about this. I will say this, to be able to get really good at this takes a long while. However, even just incorporating the bits I've filed away in my mind, it can frustrate the hell out of an opponent.

Bruce Lee was taught the Fillipino martial arts by Dan Inosanto, and he incorporated the checking systems of Escrima with those he had learned from the styles of Kung Fu he already knew. As a result, many of those that sparred with him have openly stated that he had this uncanny knack of defending in a way that left them totally defenseless (Chuck Norris had actually said this about Lee in an old issue of Black Belt magazine). His trapping and checking systems actually progressed into the budding grappling skills he wanted to incorporate into JKD. Unfortunately, he never got that far.
Some very good info in there, from my personal experience of JKD, it sounds more like Silat or Wing Chun than Eskrima though.
Regiment is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2007, 03:23 PM   #4 (permalink)
Outta My Head
 
Onganju's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Paramount, CA
Posts: 1,220
Blog Entries: 11
Onganju is on another level nowOnganju is on another level nowOnganju is on another level nowOnganju is on another level nowOnganju is on another level nowOnganju is on another level nowOnganju is on another level nowOnganju is on another level nowOnganju is on another level nowOnganju is on another level nowOnganju is on another level now
A lot of the trapping, chi sao, or sticky hands of silat or Wing Chun has very linear footwork (sometimes none at all). The difference with the Escrima checking techniques is that the block and accompanying check is usually accompanied by an adjustment in your lateral or circular placing in reference to your attacker.

Since the root of the art is weapons based, it doesn't do a person well to stay flat footed and trade with a stick or a blade (someone will get injured or die with that mentality). But if they back up too much, they will miss the chance to counter. The solution then would be to approach the opponent in an angle away from the weapon, control/check it to avoid the redonda or abaniko follow-up, and then to attack off of the now exposed side. Even when they start applying the Escrima basis to the empty-handed side (Panantukan - "boxing") of fighting, the checking and trapping is still accompanied by the footwork to create openings and angles.

When comparing the styles, that's really the big difference. You have probably seen this Chi Sao demonstration by Bruce Lee. He gets the guy a few times by stepping outside of his normal checks and hitting him from oblique angles. This was more of a demonstration of Bruce's Theories of JKD and the principles he put together (i.e. Passive Indirect Attack, Attack by Drawing, etc) through the synthesis of his studies and not just a Chi Sao contest.
__________________
It doesn't matter if you agree or disagree... As long as I don't bore you and I spark a moment of thought, my goal is achieved.

Queng leon queng tigre ecu tacacut, queca pa? - Pampangan Mandarigma Motto

My Blog <--READ IT!
Onganju is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2011, 02:41 AM   #5 (permalink)
MMA Fanatic
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 2
CJ Goldsmith has a little shameless behaviour in the past
Filipino Martial Arts

It is interesting that somebody above said that Dan taught Bruce. Now I'm not denying that Dan didn't contribute to anything Bruce Learned about FMA but Bruce was a prodigy. He was able to look at any martial art that you were teaching him see where you were going with it and teach you the rest.....AMAZING

The practicality of Filipino Martial Arts is what in my opinion an personal experience thrusts it above other martial arts. The knife being the focal point of this martial art clearly, when you think about it, elevates it's use.

Im dumbfounded everytime I watch MMA and I see the fighters not utilizing what's out there. Filipino Martial arts systems heavily emphasize footwork and although MMA Fighters are superior athletes and talented at various arts they should take some time to study Filipino Martial Arts

U CAN'T HIT WHAT YOU CAN'T SEE
CJ Goldsmith is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On

VerticalSports
Baseball Forum Golf Forum Boxing Forum Snowmobile Forum
Basketball Forum Soccer Forum MMA Forum PWC Forum
Football Forum Cricket Forum Wrestling Forum ATV Forum
Hockey Forum Volleyball Forum Paintball Forum Snowboarding Forum
Tennis Forum Rugby Forums Lacrosse Forum Skiing Forums
Copyright (C) Verticalscope Inc SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2
Powered by vBulletin Copyright © 2000-2009 Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
vBCredits v1.4 Copyright ©2007, PixelFX Studios