I used them to indicate dialogue you slack jawed yokel, I love when internet retards try to share their most basic grasp of the English language.
Really. Indicate dialogue? From who? Yourself?? You said:
I wonder if Karyn will ever be able to upload an interview without some chucklehead that's probably never kissed a girl saying something to the effect of "You can tell they banged after this LOL". Not that I think idiots should stop posting stuff like that, it's really original and funny after all.
You say "Something to the effect of..."? I cant see a single statement by anybody even remotely close to what you are suggesting you sensationalist muppet. But hey, it works up to that point, I agree. But following it with "Not that I think idiots should stop posting stuff like that"... except nobody did. Way I see it, your comment was provocative + you is being an asshole = I'm gonna say whatever I want to you because you are a provocative asshole.
Actually you are the one butchering the English language in this thread. In hypothetical speech you do use quotation marks to indicate that it is something that could be said or written. Otherwise there would be no way to distinguish it from the rest of the sentence. Trust me.
Oh, and the irony of you correcting someones grammar is honestly hilarious. In your first two posts on page one you easily make 10 grammatical errors in only a few short sentences. Not only do you have periods in the wrong places and are lacking commas, but your use of ellipsis are completely incorrect in every instance.
Normally I wouldn't say anything but I couldn't help myself after you jumped on that guy for the same thing.
Difference is Ape, that even with my awful grammar, I don't come into a topic after 3 posts and start accusing members of being a "idiots" or a "chucklehead that's probably never kissed a girl" based on hypothetical quotes that are not even remotely close to anything that's been said. When a feckwit comes along talking this kind of shit about my broheims, I dont really see why I cant throw some shit back at him, right?
RWCNT was referring to Karen's FB page where there were quite a few idiots like kreed posting comments about her and Rampage.
Her husband Wade handled them graciously and with class.
I'm fairly certain he was talking about the comments on YouTube and not this thread.
Well, maybe he should have posted his provocative bullshit on her FB/YT page instead of here, yes? Or at the very least implied he was talking about FB/YT comments. But he didn't. There isn't even a link to her FB page in the OP. He had plenty opportunity to laugh in my face and tell me he was talking about external comments, but he didn't. If RWCNT is indeed talking about those comments, then he can correct his post accordingly and I'll apologize profusely. Fair enough?