Joe Rogan: “I think they should fire judges that suck.” - MMA Forum - UFC Forums - UFC Results - MMA Videos
UFC The Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC) is a U.S.-based mixed martial arts organization, recognized as the largest MMA promotion in the world. The UFC is headquartered in Las Vegas, Nevada and is owned and operated by Zuffa, LLC. This promotion is responsible for solidifying the sport's postion in the history-books. UFC is currently undergoing a remarkable surge in popularity, along with greater mainstream media coverage. UFC programming can now be seen on FOX, FX, and FUEL TV in the United States, as well as in 35 other countries worldwide.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #1 of 12 (permalink) Old 06-14-2012, 03:32 PM Thread Starter
HiiiPoWeR
 
Rauno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Estonia
Posts: 17,676
                     
Joe Rogan: “I think they should fire judges that suck.”

Quote:
If you ask a fan of combat sports for an opinion on judging chances are he/she will not only have one but it will involve some sort of negative sentiment about the job being done. Even as recently as last weekend questionable scoring came into play when a head-scratching Split Decision was rendered in a boxing match between Manny Pacquiao-Timothy Bradley where the only three people who seemed to see things in Bradley’s favor were the fighter himself and the two judges who awarded him the win. MMA fans too were treated to a few officials’ questionable observation skills when one errantly ruled in favor of Carlos Eduardo Rocha against Mike Pierce at UFC on FX 3.
UFC announcer and lifelong fan of martial arts Joe Rogan addressed the topic this week while a guest on Bloody Elbow and had a simple, logical solution to the ongoing issue.
“I think they should fire judges that suck,” Rogan replied frankly when asked about how to handle the problem. “I don’t understand how someone can keep their job over and over again while screwing up over and over. What do you call that exactly? Extreme incompetence. How does someone judge any sort of combat sport without at least a passing interest in the sport?”
“If you pulled aside, and I don’t want to name any names, but if you pulled aside some of those judges from the Nevada State Athletic Commission, that has notoriously had horrific scoring, and started asking them about fighters that aren’t fighting in the UFC, would they know anything about them? Would they know anything about who the top judo guy is? Would they even know anything about Gilbert Melendez and how good he is,” a frustrated Rogan continued. “Do these guys know how you set up an Armbar? If I sat them down and said, ‘Do an Armbar on this guy’, would they be able to do that? I think you’ve got to know when a guy’s in trouble and when a guy’s not in trouble, and the only way to know that, is to have actually trained. I don’t think you can be a person who judges martial arts without being an expert in martial arts.”
Rogan concluded his rant by pointing out his own passion for MMA, implying officials who aren’t genuinely invested in the sport will never dedicate the kind of respect and attention it deserves in order to eliminate the blatant butchery of scorecards.
Fiveouncesofpain

Rauno is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 12 (permalink) Old 06-14-2012, 03:34 PM
The Forum Drunk
 
xeberus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 9,450
                     
I'd agree but herb cant ref every fight



If a law is unjust, a man is not only right to disobey it, he is obligated to do so. ~ Thomas Jefferson


Sig by D.P.



xeberus is offline  
post #3 of 12 (permalink) Old 06-14-2012, 03:39 PM
Featherweight
 
demoman993's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: City of Champions
Posts: 1,044
                     
Its a good point. Having guys that are training in martial arts/ex-fighters etc would make the best judges. The only thing is that you have to ensure that these guys are going to be impartial. They understand situations where a boxing judge doing an MMA fight doesn't have a clue what is going on if they are following the same "scoring" system.

Check out the new MMA Forum app for the Android
demoman993 is offline  
post #4 of 12 (permalink) Old 06-14-2012, 04:41 PM
All Around Nice Guy
 
SideWays222's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 10,760
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by xeberus View Post
I'd agree but herb cant ref every fight
Herb Dean cant ref every fight you are correct.

But we are talking about Judges not referees. Referee is the guy in the octagon there to mainly protect the fighter and make sure the rules are being followed. Judges are the guys outside of the octagon sitting in a desk. There are 3 tables each with their own judge all which are at different sides of the octagon so they each have their own angle to view the fight. If the fight goes to a decision they decide which fighter the decision goes to. Lately these judges have been making ALOT of mistakes and bad calls. Which is what Rogan is speaking on.

There you go Xeb. Now you know the difference between a Referee and a Judge.

Lol im kidding Xeb. I know that you know that i know that you know.

SideWays222 is offline  
post #5 of 12 (permalink) Old 06-14-2012, 04:55 PM
Super Ultra Great Delicious Wonderful
 
osmium's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 6,517
                     
You don't need to have trained to know when a guy is in trouble all you need are very basic understandings of the human anatomy and physics. If Joe Rogan were a judge I would want him fired.
osmium is offline  
post #6 of 12 (permalink) Old 06-14-2012, 04:56 PM
M.C
.:DISTURBED:.
 
M.C's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: California
Posts: 13,839
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by SideWays222 View Post
Herb Dean cant ref every fight you are correct.

But we are talking about Judges not referees. Referee is the guy in the octagon there to mainly protect the fighter and make sure the rules are being followed. Judges are the guys outside of the octagon sitting in a desk. There are 3 tables each with their own judge all which are at different sides of the octagon so they each have their own angle to view the fight. If the fight goes to a decision they decide which fighter the decision goes to. Lately these judges have been making ALOT of mistakes and bad calls. Which is what Rogan is speaking on.

There you go Xeb. Now you know the difference between a Referee and a Judge.

Lol im kidding Xeb. I know that you know that i know that you know.
Wait... I don't believe you, do you have a source for this ridiculous claim?

I agree with Joe, completely.
M.C is offline  
post #7 of 12 (permalink) Old 06-14-2012, 05:00 PM
The Forum Drunk
 
xeberus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 9,450
                     
Lol just re-read what I posted. I was posting quick from my iPhone, I meant that I agree, but then we'd need herb reffing all the fights to fix the bad reffing problem as well. Not that the refs do the judging xD



If a law is unjust, a man is not only right to disobey it, he is obligated to do so. ~ Thomas Jefferson


Sig by D.P.



xeberus is offline  
post #8 of 12 (permalink) Old 06-14-2012, 08:08 PM
Amateur
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 155
                     
I agree with the sentiment..in fact I think all decisions should be reviewable, and say if a larger panel re-watch the fight and determine the judges made an 'obvious' error in any round, they should face consequences.

I also think that when a fight is reviewed, and it turns out that it wasn't really a close fight, and the original judging was wrong, they should just overturn the result.
tight is offline  
post #9 of 12 (permalink) Old 06-14-2012, 08:29 PM
Featherweight
 
Iuanes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,429
                     
In this time of video replay and infinite angles there should be no reason why a bad decision should stick. Of course its impractical to review tape right after the fight and tell everyone to go home and they'll them tomorrow who the winner is. However, it really wouldn't take too much effort or money to have controversial decisions reviewed after the fact and possibly overturned. To have the only judging be exactly at the time of the fight, when every casual fan has better viewing access than the judges is retarded.
Iuanes is offline  
post #10 of 12 (permalink) Old 06-14-2012, 11:37 PM
Lightweight
 
aerius's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,515
                     
If they got rid of Cecil Peoples it would eliminate at least 2/3 of the bad decisions. Yeah, I'm down with that.
aerius is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the MMA Forum - UFC Forums - UFC Results - MMA Videos forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome