Anderson Silva Burger King Walkout Shirt Controversy - MMA Forum - UFC Forums - UFC Results - MMA Videos
UFC The Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC) is a U.S.-based mixed martial arts organization, recognized as the largest MMA promotion in the world. The UFC is headquartered in Las Vegas, Nevada and is owned and operated by Zuffa, LLC. This promotion is responsible for solidifying the sport's postion in the history-books. UFC is currently undergoing a remarkable surge in popularity, along with greater mainstream media coverage. UFC programming can now be seen on FOX, FX, and FUEL TV in the United States, as well as in 35 other countries worldwide.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #1 of 51 (permalink) Old 07-14-2012, 06:09 PM Thread Starter
MMA Fanatic
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 6
                     
Arrow Anderson Silva Burger King Walkout Shirt Controversy

Anderson Silva has a big sponsorship worth $250k (USD) for the Burger King logo on his Walkout Shirt and logo on his Nike fight shorts. There was a lot of controversy on twitter about his for the a few reasons:

1. The walkout shirt is not available for purchase - so fans cannot pick up the walkout shirt to cheer on their favorite fighter for the biggest PPV event of the year.

2. What message is it sending to the youth and aspiring MMA athletes that fast food is 'cool' or a way of life for MMA fighters?

P.S. Anyone miss the old Burger King advertisements with the King dude?

Chime in and let me know what you think about it...


Added more on the this topic at http://www.fighterstyle.com

*Just wanted to state that these are not necessarily my opinions but some of the feedback I received on twitter when I released a blog post on my site about Anderson Silva's Walkout Shirt.

Last edited by FighterStyle; 07-15-2012 at 05:31 PM.
FighterStyle is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 51 (permalink) Old 07-14-2012, 06:13 PM
Flyweight
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 242
                   
Excellent point. No different that the message that is being sent with mcdonald's sponsoring the Olympics.

Money talks. That's the message. Unfortunately.
above is offline  
post #3 of 51 (permalink) Old 07-14-2012, 06:16 PM Thread Starter
MMA Fanatic
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 6
                     
Yes, your right - its kind of a sellout move. But hey - I cant say 100% that I wouldnt take the money if I was in his shoes.
FighterStyle is offline  
post #4 of 51 (permalink) Old 07-14-2012, 06:31 PM
CAN I GET AN AMEN?
 
xxpillowxxjp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Memphis, Tennessee
Posts: 1,616
                     
You're second point is pretty out there. You don't take sponsorships because you support the company, you take it to make the money. Now you could definitely decline a sponsorship because you don't support their cause. It's alot more of a "Why not?" question you would ask yourself.

Dominick Cruz | Jose Aldo | Donald Cerrone | Vitor Belfort | Fedor | Daniel Cormier
xxpillowxxjp is offline  
post #5 of 51 (permalink) Old 07-14-2012, 06:32 PM
Bantamweight
 
Rastaman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 769
                     
There is no controversy at all. Let me respond to each point:

1. There is no shirt available:
So what? Why does this even matter? Why can't a company make a shirt for only one person, I don't understand why this is even an issue. Also, who the hell would want to wear a shirt that had a giant Burger King logo on it.

2. Burger King is unhealthy, so it sends the wrong message:
This is more valid than the previous point, but still totally off base. Eating at Burger King, while not the healthiest food around, will not make you fat/have health problems unless you a) do it frequently, or b) don't exercise enough to cancel out the incoming calories. I don't see why the Olympics shouldn't be sponsored by McDonald's, and I don't see why a professional fighter who obviously understands well enough the ins and outs of nutrition should not be able to walk out in a shirt sponsored by Burger King. I swear, our current society is so concerned with protecting the "kids" that they fail to realize that any kid/parent/person who is swayed to eat Burger King (for example) to an unhealthy degree simply because their favorite fighter walks out wearing a shirt w/ logo probably deserves the negative health effects associated with eating unhealthy foods anyway.

If McDonald's were to be sponsoring the Olympics, I fully understand that there would be millions upon millions of people worldwide that would begin, consciously or subconsciously, to eat McDonald's more and thus become more unhealthy. But that leads us to a twist on a classic philosophical question: If a weak-minded person sees a McDonald's advertisement, and shifts their diet to match what it advertises and consequently becomes fat and unhealthy, does anybody care?

vBookie Record: 16-9

Current vBookie Bets:
Rastaman is offline  
post #6 of 51 (permalink) Old 07-14-2012, 06:32 PM
Heavyweight
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,705
                     
Who cares if fighters sponsor fast food, they eat it as well, Anderson has said and made videos even when he wasn't sponsored that he enjoyed the burgers.

If you buy a product just because your favourite fighter is sponsoring it, then you really should take a look at yourself. Everything is ok in moderation. If you eat a bigmac or whopper once a month, there aren't any problems doing that, baring you eat healthy. If you start eating a burger every week or couple of days, then thats where the problems start.

Also, wearing a walk out t-shirt in public isn't cool or stylish, maybe to an event but not in the general public.

Why is there a problem for fighters to be sponsored by fast food companies, but not for the UFC and other big promotions/sports companies to be sponsored by alcohol? if anything, its worse.
Spec0688 is offline  
post #7 of 51 (permalink) Old 07-14-2012, 06:35 PM
Flyweight
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Cork, Ireland
Posts: 498
                     
Always finding a reason to hate:

1. Clearly Nike made his walkout t-shirt. But they don't manufacture or distribute MMA gear, and why would they sell a shirt covered with other companies advertisements?

2. Anderson is known to love a burger or two. So why wouldn't he support them? It's not his responsibility to tell people what to eat. If they overindulge then how is it his fault?
beardsleybob is offline  
post #8 of 51 (permalink) Old 07-14-2012, 06:44 PM
All Eyez on Me
 
vilify's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 2,481
                     
This is stupid. You aren't expected to buy the shirt just the food. Also It may not be the healthiest but its not poison either.
vilify is offline  
post #9 of 51 (permalink) Old 07-14-2012, 06:45 PM
Flyweight
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 242
                   
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rastaman View Post
I swear, our current society is so concerned with protecting the "kids" that they fail to realize that any kid/parent/person who is swayed to eat Burger King (for example) to an unhealthy degree simply because their favorite fighter walks out wearing a shirt w/ logo probably deserves the negative health effects associated with eating unhealthy foods anyway.

If McDonald's were to be sponsoring the Olympics, I fully understand that there would be millions upon millions of people worldwide that would begin, consciously or subconsciously, to eat McDonald's more and thus become more unhealthy. But that leads us to a twist on a classic philosophical question: If a weak-minded person sees a McDonald's advertisement, and shifts their diet to match what it advertises and consequently becomes fat and unhealthy, does anybody care?
As far as the parenting comment is concerned I agree with you.

As far as Silva being sponsored by Burger King is concerned, while paradoxical given that fast food is junk, I wouldn't castrate him for it. Personally, if I were an athlete at that level I would pick and choose my sponsors more carefully.

Now as far the Olympics and mcdonald's is conceded I am in complete disagreement. The Olympics has a long history behind it stemming all the way to ancient Greece. Having such garbage sponsor the Olympics (when it isn't necessary - they could have raised the money from elsewhere) is simply foolish and downright disgusting. It tarnishes the Olympic spirit. Even worse, mcdonalds will be the only food vendor at the olympics. That compounds the problem even more. I mean seriously... You go t the olympics and the only official food vendor allowed is mcdonald's? WTF?!
above is offline  
post #10 of 51 (permalink) Old 07-14-2012, 07:00 PM
LL
Cruz Control
 
LL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Ocean Front Property in Arizona.
Posts: 9,159
                     


It's pretty common for athletes to be sponsored by fast food chains. Also, you can find the shorts Anderson wore on Nike's store. They've got them in a few different colors.

http://store.nike.com/us/en_us/?l=sh...54/pgid-440055

2013 VIP FFL Champion
THE DRAGON RIDES AGAIN - 12/20/14
Machida - Alves - Cruz - JDS - Weidman - Condit - Pettis - Edgar - Cowboy - Dodson - Okami
LL is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the MMA Forum - UFC Forums - UFC Results - MMA Videos forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome