Alan Belcher Makes His Case for the Middleweight Belt - Page 2 - MMA Forum - UFC Forums - UFC Results - MMA Videos
UFC The Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC) is a U.S.-based mixed martial arts organization, recognized as the largest MMA promotion in the world. The UFC is headquartered in Las Vegas, Nevada and is owned and operated by Zuffa, LLC. This promotion is responsible for solidifying the sport's postion in the history-books. UFC is currently undergoing a remarkable surge in popularity, along with greater mainstream media coverage. UFC programming can now be seen on FOX, FX, and FUEL TV in the United States, as well as in 35 other countries worldwide.

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #11 of 13 (permalink) Old 07-17-2012, 10:15 PM
John8204's Avatar
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 7,880
Originally Posted by TheLyotoLegion View Post
Anderson, Sonnen, Weidman, Munoz, Belcher, Bisping, Vitor, Boestch, Okami, and Lombard aren't one dimensional.

The only other guy besides Palhares whose a title contender that could be called one dimensional is Stann and he's not really close to a title shot and no one is certainly calling for him to get one like they were with Palhares.

Belcher doesn't need to move over to Strikeforce or fight Rockhold or Jacare either, the Middleweight division is pretty simple, Anderson, Weidman, Lombard/Boestch winner, and Vitor all need fights, my guess is if Lombard wins, we see Weidman/Belcher for a title shot, if Boestch wins, we see Boestch vs. Belcher.
I think Vitor is fairly one dimensional, Bisping is a can crusher, Silva and Belcher aren't valid for this discussion, he can't fight himself and his goal is a title. Sonnen and Okami are fairly standard wrestlers. Mark Munoz....might fall out of the top ten, likely will with another loss. And Lombard is a so called can crusher. Only Tim Boetsch and Chris Weidman might be considered multidimensional fighters who have beaten top contenders.

As for your synopsis it's predicated on several things mostly that Belfort and Bisping aren't in the title mix ahead of Belcher. Most seem to think that they are. Lombard and Weidman are in the mix the one that doesn't fight Anderson will fight a title eliminator with first preference going to Bisping, second to Belfort, third to Stann, and Belcher is fourth in line.

Alan Belcher doesn't need to jump over the Strikeforce he may be able to move up from this log jam at 185. But if he does jump over he gets to face Rockhold for the title and when Strikeforce folds he'll get a title merge. I think Rockhold is a better matchup for him than Belfort/Bisping as they are similar styled fighters and Belcher has much more seasoning.
John8204 is offline  
Sponsored Links
post #12 of 13 (permalink) Old 07-18-2012, 02:14 AM
No_Mercy's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 11,496
It could very well be Belcher vs Weidman or Munoz. If I were in Belcher's camp I'd want to fight someone who just won though unless it's Chael. That fight would catapult him to contendership status. Palhares is definitely one of the most dangerous threats in the division.

The way I see it, it's going to be Lombard next followed by Belcher, and a toss up between Weidman and Bisping.

Both Belcher and Bisping have been fighting in the UFC since 2006. Weidman just started mma in 2009 and in the UFC recently. Kinda puts things in perspective.

Marcus Aurelius: Tell me again, Maximus, why are we here?
Maximus: For the glory of the Empire, sire.

Baked, not fried... the healthy choice.

No_Mercy is offline  
post #13 of 13 (permalink) Old 07-18-2012, 02:51 PM
Rastaman's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 769
I wish they would have put Belcher vs. Lombard once they signed him, that help clear things up a little bit.

vBookie Record: 16-9

Current vBookie Bets:
Rastaman is offline  

Quick Reply

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the MMA Forum - UFC Forums - UFC Results - MMA Videos forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:


Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On

For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome