Is two belts per weight class the answer? - MMA Forum - UFC Forums - UFC Results - MMA Videos
UFC The Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC) is a U.S.-based mixed martial arts organization, recognized as the largest MMA promotion in the world. The UFC is headquartered in Las Vegas, Nevada and is owned and operated by Zuffa, LLC. This promotion is responsible for solidifying the sport's postion in the history-books. UFC is currently undergoing a remarkable surge in popularity, along with greater mainstream media coverage. UFC programming can now be seen on FOX, FX, and FUEL TV in the United States, as well as in 35 other countries worldwide.

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #1 of 48 (permalink) Old 08-13-2012, 01:09 AM Thread Starter
Bantamweight
 
RearNaked's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Swinging from Roy Nelson's nuts.
Posts: 848
                     
Is two belts per weight class the answer?

I know I know, you all hate boxing and everything about it.

But if there were two belts per weight class in the UFC, and two distinct champions, would that basically fix all the problems?

Not a champ and an interim champ. Two separate champs.

That way when one champion is injured or doesn't want to fight for 6+ months at a time, there'd be a different champion to do it instead.

And there'd be no, 'oh so and so has no chance to dethrone the champ' because there'd be two champs. And in order to stay relevant champions would pretty much HAVE to fight, or just get forgotten.

Also with two belts, it would be a lot easier to strip champions imo since there'd be two of them anyway.

I'm sure this suggestion will get a lot of counter arguments, so I'll wait for the specific counter argument to crop up, before I explain why this would be better.
RearNaked is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 48 (permalink) Old 08-13-2012, 01:11 AM
Flyweight
 
BigPont's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 224
                     
Worst thread EVER.
BigPont is offline  
post #3 of 48 (permalink) Old 08-13-2012, 01:12 AM Thread Starter
Bantamweight
 
RearNaked's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Swinging from Roy Nelson's nuts.
Posts: 848
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigPont View Post
Worst thread EVER.
Yeah because no fight sport in history has ever had two different champions at the same weight class.

Oh wait...

PRIDE GP champ and world champ.
RearNaked is offline  
post #4 of 48 (permalink) Old 08-13-2012, 01:14 AM
Flyweight
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 351
                     
If there are too many fighters in one weight class, the answer is, you make another weight class.

A lot of 155'ers could easilly fight at 145, but not so many at 170lb, but they are big for 155. So maybe a 165 or something like that.
StandThemUp is offline  
post #5 of 48 (permalink) Old 08-13-2012, 01:14 AM Thread Starter
Bantamweight
 
RearNaked's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Swinging from Roy Nelson's nuts.
Posts: 848
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by StandThemUp View Post
If there are too many fighters in one weight class, the answer is, you make another weight class.

A lot of 155'ers could easilly fight at 145, but not so many at 170lb, but they are big for 155. So maybe a 165 or something like that.
That's a good alternative.

I like either solution.
RearNaked is offline  
post #6 of 48 (permalink) Old 08-13-2012, 01:32 AM
MMA Fanatic
 
ArcherCC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 92
                     
Two belts, really two friggin belts, that would mean people like Fitch would have been considered a 'champion'.

Plus seriously how do you determine who the real best in a divison is, do you let them fight and unify the belts? Is one the CHAMP and the other the Sorta Champ? Do you have to beat the Sorta Champ to fight the CHAMP?
ArcherCC is offline  
post #7 of 48 (permalink) Old 08-13-2012, 01:36 AM
Lightweight
 
MikeHawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,883
                     
Why not 3?
MikeHawk is offline  
post #8 of 48 (permalink) Old 08-13-2012, 01:37 AM
"Focus"
 
Life B Ez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Detroit, MI
Posts: 9,914
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by RearNaked View Post
Yeah because no fight sport in history has ever had two different champions at the same weight class.

Oh wait...

PRIDE GP champ and world champ.
I can name only two. Boxing, which has been on rough ground since there has been more than one belt and professional wrestling.

So short answer no. Long answer HELL NO.

Think. It Ain't Illegal Yet
"Discipline Hurts Less Than Regret"
Life B Ez is offline  
post #9 of 48 (permalink) Old 08-13-2012, 01:38 AM Thread Starter
Bantamweight
 
RearNaked's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Swinging from Roy Nelson's nuts.
Posts: 848
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by ArcherCC View Post
Two belts, really two friggin belts, that would mean people like Fitch would have been considered a 'champion'.

Plus seriously how do you determine who the real best in a divison is, do you let them fight and unify the belts? Is one the CHAMP and the other the Sorta Champ? Do you have to beat the Sorta Champ to fight the CHAMP?
Nope.

Two distinct belts.

Remember when Wanderlei Silva was the PRIDE champ and Chuck Liddel was the UFC champ?

That was a lot more fun imo.

It stirs debate/controversy. It makes things more exciting.

It leads to more compelling forum shit-talking.

Two champs is better imo. I don't need one supreme champ, especially if he only fights twice a year and hand picks his opponents.

Having two different champs would force champs to fight, and to fight legit competition because otherwise everyone would say 'meh, who cares about X, Y is the better champ anyway'

Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeHawk View Post
Why not 3?
Not enough fighters in each division for 3 champs imo, but maybe one day.

Hey guys, novel idea, how about you actually put forth some counter arguments like STU or Archer instead of just going the Bill O'Reilly route?

But it's up to you how you want to answer at the end of the day.
RearNaked is offline  
post #10 of 48 (permalink) Old 08-13-2012, 01:42 AM
"Focus"
 
Life B Ez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Detroit, MI
Posts: 9,914
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by RearNaked View Post
Nope.

Two distinct belts.

Remember when Wanderlei Silva was the PRIDE champ and Chuck Liddel was the UFC champ?

That was a lot more fun imo.

It stirs debate/controversy. It makes things more exciting.

It leads to more compelling forum shit-talking.

Two champs is better imo. I don't need one supreme champ, especially if he only fights twice a year and hand picks his opponents.

Having two different champs would force champs to fight, and to fight legit competition because otherwise everyone would say 'meh, who cares about X, Y is the better champ anyway'
Because they were in different organizations. It was all about who would win, why have two guys that could be matched up with one another not fight for the sake of the talk.....

I don't usually say things like this but this is easily one of the dumbest ******* ideas that has ever graced this forum.

Think. It Ain't Illegal Yet
"Discipline Hurts Less Than Regret"
Life B Ez is offline  
Closed Thread

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the MMA Forum - UFC Forums - UFC Results - MMA Videos forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome