Ranking System? Time to Reform UFC! - Page 2 - MMA Forum - UFC Forums - UFC Results - MMA Videos
UFC The Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC) is a U.S.-based mixed martial arts organization, recognized as the largest MMA promotion in the world. The UFC is headquartered in Las Vegas, Nevada and is owned and operated by Zuffa, LLC. This promotion is responsible for solidifying the sport's postion in the history-books. UFC is currently undergoing a remarkable surge in popularity, along with greater mainstream media coverage. UFC programming can now be seen on FOX, FX, and FUEL TV in the United States, as well as in 35 other countries worldwide.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #11 of 18 (permalink) Old 08-24-2012, 06:36 PM
....Omar Comin'
 
El Bresko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Sydney, Australia.
Posts: 4,797
                     
Their rankings take into account a whole bunch of factors and I believe they are set up using mathematics, not just some fat guy deciding who is the best on the planet.

If you don't fight for 6 months i'm fairly sure they take you off the rankings. Fairies Nuts IMO (fair enough).

and yeah, Kampmann is the man! He could very easily be on a 7 fight win streak right now if the judges had been a little kinder to him. Erick Silva will jump so high up after he dominates Fitch.







El Bresko is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #12 of 18 (permalink) Old 08-25-2012, 12:27 AM
Ultra-weight
 
slapshot's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Spokane
Posts: 6,210
                     
Never going to happen.

sakurabushidokan.homestead.com
slapshot is offline  
post #13 of 18 (permalink) Old 08-25-2012, 12:48 AM
MMA Fanatic
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 70
                     
Maybe do the ranking by top money earner. Just a suggestion as money is all these fighters motivates.

And its all about the money than the stats nowadays.
djripz is offline  
post #14 of 18 (permalink) Old 08-25-2012, 05:40 AM
Amateur
 
Samin00's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 154
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by DrFunk View Post

That said here's some things I'd like to see:


3. Contender gets his ranking point adjusted to #1 contender if he somehow wins the match vs the champ on short notice. (this way people get the auto re-match to see if it was a fluke, a belt should be earned not won on a gimmick).
Dont agree with this one, jon jones accepted shogun on a short notice and absolutly dominated him, people arent interested in a remath between the 2 of them a year after.... imagine theyd be forced to do a rematch right after their first fight
Samin00 is offline  
post #15 of 18 (permalink) Old 08-26-2012, 12:40 AM Thread Starter
Amateur
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 177
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by Samin00 View Post
Dont agree with this one, jon jones accepted shogun on a short notice and absolutly dominated him, people arent interested in a remath between the 2 of them a year after.... imagine theyd be forced to do a rematch right after their first fight
The main incentive behind that is because this way no champ would be ducking challenges. Having your opponent you've trained for be replaced by a random fighter in the last 10 days is a valid concern for any champion. Plus, whoever steps in really didn't "deserve" the shot to begin with, they just happen to be available and willing to fight. So with that in mind, the champ will accept anyone since he knows he'll still keep the belt. The contender can boost himself to #1 contender from middle of the pack by beating the champ while making title fight money (which would be a big jump for a lot of them).

More important than money though, a lot of fighters would love to have a best out of 3 or in this case a min of 2 fights guaranteed IF the short notice fighter wins vs the champ. The MMA game has evolved to the point now that the more they study each other, the more they can make adjustments. This is why I feel having 2 fighters fight at least twice will give a better judgement for the winner. Instead of a random flash KO win etc.. I still stand by the fact that the short notice replacement really has no business getting a title shot, if they did they'd be the #1 contender fighting legitimately. Just because they're stepping in as a favour shouldn't seal the belt for them. Being paid title money and then get boosted up towards #1 contender should be more than enough (especially if they're stuck in the middle of the pack purgatory).

Lastly, the champ has a gross advantage over the short term reps. Even if they didn't prepare vs random fighter X, their body is ready to go for fight night. Most of these random replacement fighters are out of shape and certainly didn't have any training camp to prep vs the champ. So odds are the champ will usually if not always win so the rematch worry is almost non existent while fixing the whole ducking issue.
DrFunk is offline  
post #16 of 18 (permalink) Old 08-26-2012, 01:05 AM
All Around Nice Guy
 
SideWays222's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 10,760
                     
Well a Champion that had a 90 day training camp should certainly not be allowed to pull out of the fight due to his opponent getting injured. The opponent stepping up is the one who is "Actually" stepping up on short notice. That should have been a rule since day 1. I hope they make headliners sign contracts from now on that state you are "agreeing to fight on this date" instead of "you are agreeing to fight this opponent".

An injury or something else horrible should be the only reason a champion is allowed to pull out.

Wanting 3 more weeks to prepare after having 90 days... is not a good reason.

SideWays222 is offline  
post #17 of 18 (permalink) Old 08-26-2012, 01:38 AM
Flyweight
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 230
                     
styles can make fights. i honestly think that it is better to have matchmakers trying to find who can cause trouble for the champion rather than quantifying win streaks.

Reward win streaks frequently, but fast track people who have the right skill sets (in theory).
halifaxdonair is offline  
post #18 of 18 (permalink) Old 08-26-2012, 01:50 AM
All Around Nice Guy
 
SideWays222's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 10,760
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by halifaxdonair View Post
styles can make fights. i honestly think that it is better to have matchmakers trying to find who can cause trouble for the champion rather than quantifying win streaks.

Reward win streaks frequently, but fast track people who have the right skill sets (in theory).
Yeah i support this too. There are some fighters that might never win enough fights in a row to get a title shot BUT have the skillset that would give problems for the champion. Alot of time its those "interesting" fights that i want and not some guy that is on a role but we know has no chance to win the belt.

SideWays222 is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the MMA Forum - UFC Forums - UFC Results - MMA Videos forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome