New rule to insure we dont have the JBJ situation happen again - MMA Forum - UFC Forums - UFC Results - MMA Videos
UFC The Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC) is a U.S.-based mixed martial arts organization, recognized as the largest MMA promotion in the world. The UFC is headquartered in Las Vegas, Nevada and is owned and operated by Zuffa, LLC. This promotion is responsible for solidifying the sport's postion in the history-books. UFC is currently undergoing a remarkable surge in popularity, along with greater mainstream media coverage. UFC programming can now be seen on FOX, FX, and FUEL TV in the United States, as well as in 35 other countries worldwide.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #1 of 26 (permalink) Old 08-25-2012, 05:14 PM Thread Starter
MMA Fanatic
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 10
                     
New rule to insure we dont have the JBJ situation happen again

I think the UFC should implament a new rule that excludes any champion from turing down a fight on short notice when their original opponent pulls out from injury. I am fine with anyone else having the right to do so, as long as they are not the champion. If you wear a UFC belt, you should never turn down a scheduled fight just because the opponent has changed. The champion is the champion for a reason, and if you want to wear the belt, thats just part of the deal. If you dont like it, GO PLAY CHECKERS!!
Never Out is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 26 (permalink) Old 08-25-2012, 05:18 PM
Lightweight
 
MikeHawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,883
                     
There's no need for a rule like that. No one would be stupid enough to repeat what Jones has done. They've seen how badly it turned out for him.
MikeHawk is offline  
post #3 of 26 (permalink) Old 08-25-2012, 05:23 PM
Bantamweight
 
RearNaked's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Swinging from Roy Nelson's nuts.
Posts: 848
                     
My two belts suggestion isn`t looking so crazy now, is it?
RearNaked is offline  
post #4 of 26 (permalink) Old 08-25-2012, 05:29 PM
"Focus"
 
Life B Ez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Detroit, MI
Posts: 9,920
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by RearNaked View Post
My two belts suggestion isn`t looking so crazy now, is it?
How would two belts have helped this situation? Do both champs need to train to fight on the same card that way the reserve champ can step in a case like this? I'm sure you'll say oh but Jon would have taken the fight because then he would have feared people saying the other champ is better. Except the other champ at 205 would be someone he has already beat. And how would beating Sonnen have helped Jones' case as the best in that was the scenario.

That is still the dumbest ******* thing I have ever heard.

Think. It Ain't Illegal Yet
"Discipline Hurts Less Than Regret"
Life B Ez is offline  
post #5 of 26 (permalink) Old 08-25-2012, 05:47 PM
All Eyez on Me
 
vilify's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 2,481
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by RearNaked View Post
My two belts suggestion isn`t looking so crazy now, is it?
It's looking as stupid as ever
vilify is offline  
post #6 of 26 (permalink) Old 08-25-2012, 05:59 PM
Earthquake Survivor
 
Chileandude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,936
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by Never Out View Post
I think the UFC should implament a new rule that excludes any champion from turing down a fight on short notice when their original opponent pulls out from injury. I am fine with anyone else having the right to do so, as long as they are not the champion. If you wear a UFC belt, you should never turn down a scheduled fight just because the opponent has changed. The champion is the champion for a reason, and if you want to wear the belt, thats just part of the deal. If you dont like it, GO PLAY CHECKERS!!
This is a terrible idea, people could collude to switch challengers on short notice and catch the champion off guard.



Chileandude is offline  
post #7 of 26 (permalink) Old 08-25-2012, 06:03 PM
Flyweight
 
BigPont's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 224
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by RearNaked View Post
My two belts suggestion isn`t looking so crazy now, is it?
Maybe I jumped the gun when I said that was the worst post ever. Still a terrible idea, but this is worse.
BigPont is offline  
post #8 of 26 (permalink) Old 08-25-2012, 06:19 PM
KO artist
 
Liddellianenko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Iowa
Posts: 5,148
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chileandude View Post
This is a terrible idea, people could collude to switch challengers on short notice and catch the champion off guard.
bingo, which is EXACTLY what was just attempted by Dan and Chael. Why hide the injury eh?
Liddellianenko is offline  
post #9 of 26 (permalink) Old 08-25-2012, 06:21 PM Thread Starter
MMA Fanatic
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 10
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chileandude View Post
This is a terrible idea, people could collude to switch challengers on short notice and catch the champion off guard.
Who gives a crap. The champion should be the best and be ready to fight ANYONE they put in front of him as long as he is in shape.
Never Out is offline  
post #10 of 26 (permalink) Old 08-25-2012, 06:25 PM
KO artist
 
Liddellianenko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Iowa
Posts: 5,148
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by Never Out View Post
Who gives a crap. The champion should be the best and be ready to fight ANYONE they put in front of him as long as he is in shape.
Yeah, lets let the challengers bring in steel chairs and chainsaws too. Who cares, HE'S THE CHAMP DAMMIT! SMASH THAT CHAINSAW AND ENTERTAIN US!
Liddellianenko is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the MMA Forum - UFC Forums - UFC Results - MMA Videos forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome