The real reason guys turn down last minute replacement fights? - MMA Forum - UFC Forums - UFC Results - MMA Videos
UFC The Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC) is a U.S.-based mixed martial arts organization, recognized as the largest MMA promotion in the world. The UFC is headquartered in Las Vegas, Nevada and is owned and operated by Zuffa, LLC. This promotion is responsible for solidifying the sport's postion in the history-books. UFC is currently undergoing a remarkable surge in popularity, along with greater mainstream media coverage. UFC programming can now be seen on FOX, FX, and FUEL TV in the United States, as well as in 35 other countries worldwide.

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #1 of 8 (permalink) Old 11-17-2012, 05:51 PM Thread Starter
BlueLander's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 355
The real reason guys turn down last minute replacement fights?

This kinda crossed my mind when reading that Kongo turned down the Nelson fight.

I think it's pretty widely speculated that a lot of MMA fighters are taking some form of PED/HGH/TRT etc, and while I'm certainly no expert (or even have mediocre knowledge) on banned substances, do you think a good number of guys turn down replacement fights due to getting caught in a drug test?

From the little knowledge I have, cycling certain substances is all about timing. I'd have to guess some of these guys simply weren't cycled properly when offered to be a replacement and didn't want to risk getting busted.

Think this is more the case then not? Or probably because of other reasons?

Sorry if his has been discussed before.
BlueLander is offline  
Sponsored Links
post #2 of 8 (permalink) Old 11-17-2012, 07:30 PM
It's Hammer Time!
Hammerlock2.0's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Germany
Posts: 9,589
I think it can be a reason for turning down a fight but there are more reasons. Most fighters get out of shape when they don't have a fight scheduled, maybe there are private reasons, maybe he just doesn't want to fight or maybe he just started a cycle.

To be honest I expect every person in every sport that doesn't have regular testing to be on some sort of performance enhancer.

Rookie Hammer Squad 2015
Frankie Edgar - Dominick Cruz - Jorge Masvidal - Cat Zingano - Holly Holm
Hammerlock2.0 is offline  
post #3 of 8 (permalink) Old 11-17-2012, 07:39 PM
_CaptainRon's Avatar
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Dallas, Texas, USA
Posts: 643
This is a good point and certainly a factor, but I'd say the particular opponent has the greater impact in the decision.

"Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man."
_CaptainRon is offline  
post #4 of 8 (permalink) Old 11-17-2012, 07:40 PM
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 561
I think it's a very real possibility (dodging testing).

It would be interesting if they started randomly testing fighters during downtime, during training camp, or especially if you turn down a fight. However that could become a problem for the UFC if a large number of these guys are using, and start testing positive.

There's no doubt in my mind that a lot of these guys have used at one point in their life. They are under a lot of pressure to win, the rewards for winning are huge, and they themselves (or the people around them) have know-how of how testing/cycling works, and so on.

That's my opinion on pretty much every professional sport to be honest.
RedRocket44 is offline  
post #5 of 8 (permalink) Old 11-17-2012, 08:06 PM
Hawndo's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Dundee, Scotland
Posts: 2,139
I'd say cycles play a huge role to be honest.

Thanks to Leakler for the sig
Hawndo is offline  
post #6 of 8 (permalink) Old 11-17-2012, 08:22 PM
John8204's Avatar
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 8,011
It could be that but a big thing I recall hearing that it's much harder to lock in proper sponsorship for last minute fights.
John8204 is offline  
post #7 of 8 (permalink) Old 11-17-2012, 08:25 PM
The Bearded One
AmdM's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Lisbon - Portugal
Posts: 3,915
Well, the UFC says that don't punish fighters who lose after accepting short notice fights but the truth is that they will take that fight into account if they wanna cut you, or disregard the fact that you already accepted a short notice fight and badmouth you if you turn down the 2nd (thinking about Lyoto here).

Lyoto Machida, former UFC LHW hamp
Future UFC MW Champ
Benavidez, Barao, Aldo, Nate, Nick, Lyoto, TBD, JDS
Forever hanging in Anderson Silva nuts
AmdM is offline  
post #8 of 8 (permalink) Old 11-17-2012, 08:40 PM
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,705
I think other things play a larger factor than making sure they cycle properly. Lets use Kongo as the recent example...

He isn't in full fight shape, and he's going against a fighter who is very hard to finish, and has a great top game if he were to take Kongo down. UFC can say all they want about how Kongo wouldn't be punished in the rankings but the fact is that if Kongo lost, he would go down the rankings no matter if its a short notice fight or not.

It just doesn't make sense for any of the higher ranking fighters in their weight class to take short notice fights, not that Kongo is exactly high up, but he's not one of those fighters needing to prove themselves. There is a very large gap in terms of what you gain and lose out of that fight.
Spec0688 is offline  

Quick Reply

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the MMA Forum - UFC Forums - UFC Results - MMA Videos forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:


Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On

For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome