Ring performance vs Octagon's
In another thread, El Bresko brought up a point about Mirko Cro Cop and the difference in his performances in the rings and in the octagon and I would like to know opinions on what are the major differences for the fighters using one stage or another, specially considering many of the fights listed where stand up fights?
Here is the quote "respectifully stolen" :thumb02: Quote:
|
Personally, I think Fedor in a cage is a lot more beatable than Fedor in a ring.
Was it the Werdum fight where he wall walked to sink in the triangle? I just don't think Fedor was even expecting it having spent so much of his fight career in a ring. That is just one of many examples i can think of where a Legend in the ring lost in a cage because it just wasnt their arena. |
I think alot of it has to do with footwork. Cro Cop has fought in the ring for years in both K-1 and Pride. He mastered the art of closing off parts of the ring, backing people up into corners etc. Also, without the cage to lean up against, in order to engage a clinch, his opponents have to move out of the way and usually they moved right into a CC head kick or left hook.
|
Aren't the rings generally bigger then the cages?
|
Quote:
Have a butchers at this thread. |
Its so much harder to cut off a person from circling when in an octagon. 8 sides, and the angles are so wide it is almost like a circle. If the fighter doesn't have good footwork, he is gonna be chasing his opponent for the entire fight.
Gives an advantage to fighters who circle and counter punch though. Fighters like Bisping, Machida and Anderson Silva, the octagon benefits them. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Edit: UFC Octagon Source - http://answers.yahoo.com/question/in...9133213AAdO7yA Quote:
source - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pride_FC#Ring Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:47 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.8 , Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2