***OFFICIAL*** Gunnar Nelson vs. Jorge Santiago Thread - MMA Forum - UFC Forums - UFC Results - MMA Videos
UFC The Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC) is a U.S.-based mixed martial arts organization, recognized as the largest MMA promotion in the world. The UFC is headquartered in Las Vegas, Nevada and is owned and operated by Zuffa, LLC. This promotion is responsible for solidifying the sport's postion in the history-books. UFC is currently undergoing a remarkable surge in popularity, along with greater mainstream media coverage. UFC programming can now be seen on FOX, FX, and FUEL TV in the United States, as well as in 35 other countries worldwide.

View Poll Results: Your prediction
Gunnar Nelson 16 80.00%
Jorge Santiago 4 20.00%
Draw 0 0%
Voters: 20. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #1 of 51 (permalink) Old 02-05-2013, 09:02 AM Thread Starter
 
Budhisten's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Denmark
Posts: 9,216
                     
***OFFICIAL*** Gunnar Nelson vs. Jorge Santiago Thread

Welterweight bout: 170 pounds





MMAForum - Please follow, like and download our app!
Budhisten is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 51 (permalink) Old 02-05-2013, 03:08 PM
 
K R Y's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Wales, Boyo!
Posts: 10,705
                     
Gunnar by whatever he wants. He's better everywhere.






“There are three things all wise men fear: the sea in storm, a night with no moon, and the anger of a gentle man.”
K R Y is offline  
post #3 of 51 (permalink) Old 02-05-2013, 03:46 PM
Amateur
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 138
                     
gunnar nelson next welterweight champion
Tiptup is offline  
post #4 of 51 (permalink) Old 02-06-2013, 12:38 PM
Flyweight
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 404
                     
I'm picking Gunnar in this fight but I think an upset is very possible. Santiago was being touted as one of the better welterweights in the world before his previous return to the UFC , I think he is the toughest guy Gunnar has had to fight so far. Should be a good test for him and should give everyone a good idea of how good Gunnar actually is.
rebonecrusher is offline  
post #5 of 51 (permalink) Old 02-06-2013, 12:51 PM
OU
Ultra-weight
 
OU's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 6,080
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by K R Y View Post
Gunnar by whatever he wants. He's better everywhere.
Completely disagree. Santiago should have never been cut. I expect him to be even better at WW.
OU is offline  
post #6 of 51 (permalink) Old 02-06-2013, 02:15 PM
Colossal-weight
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 8,550
                     
Jorge was never that good. He had trouble in the UFC before. He left and racked up wins vs. average to well below average fighters. He got ranked because he had a lot of wins in a row. He came to the UFC and got dismantled and kicked out of any rankings.

He has some skill. But it doesn't translate well to big boy MMA. He gets KO'd quite easily. He has some sneaky submissions but that won't be a factor vs. Gunnar.

Gunnar should roll here.
jonnyg4508 is offline  
post #7 of 51 (permalink) Old 02-06-2013, 02:19 PM
OU
Ultra-weight
 
OU's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 6,080
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by jonnyg4508 View Post
Jorge was never that good. He had trouble in the UFC before. He left and racked up wins vs. average to well below average fighters. He got ranked because he had a lot of wins in a row. He came to the UFC and got dismantled and kicked out of any rankings.

He has some skill. But it doesn't translate well to big boy MMA. He gets KO'd quite easily. He has some sneaky submissions but that won't be a factor vs. Gunnar.

Gunnar should roll here.
He lost to Stann and Maia, no shame in that. He deserved to stay on roster. This will be his easiest fight in the UFC since he fought Leben in 06.
OU is offline  
post #8 of 51 (permalink) Old 02-06-2013, 02:30 PM
Colossal-weight
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 8,550
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by OU View Post
He lost to Stann and Maia, no shame in that. He deserved to stay on roster. This will be his easiest fight in the UFC since he fought Leben in 06.
Maybe he did.

But he isn't exactly a name like Dan Hardy that casuals know. He probably commanded a decent pay for being a "top 10 fighter".

He couldn't hang with top 10 fighters....so they cut him. In 4 of 5 UFC fights he has been KO'd 3 times and lost the other 30-27 on all cards. The win was vs. a nobody.

If you come in and are paid more because of your ranking, expect to get cut if you don't live up to that ranking. Or anywhere even close.

He has some skills. He is good enough to be on the roster. Doesn't mean he shouldn't of been cut though. At some point he needs to win in the UFC. They didn't bring Jorge in last time to beat up on cans. They brought him in to tout him as a top 10 guy who would give other top 10s a hard time...and he hasn't.
jonnyg4508 is offline  
post #9 of 51 (permalink) Old 02-06-2013, 02:37 PM
OU
Ultra-weight
 
OU's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 6,080
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by jonnyg4508 View Post
Maybe he did.

But he isn't exactly a name like Dan Hardy that casuals know. He probably commanded a decent pay for being a "top 10 fighter".

He couldn't hang with top 10 fighters....so they cut him. In 4 of 5 UFC fights he has been KO'd 3 times and lost the other 30-27 on all cards. The win was vs. a nobody.

If you come in and are paid more because of your ranking, expect to get cut if you don't live up to that ranking. Or anywhere even close.

He has some skills. He is good enough to be on the roster. Doesn't mean he shouldn't of been cut though. At some point he needs to win in the UFC. They didn't bring Jorge in last time to beat up on cans. They brought him in to tout him as a top 10 guy who would give other top 10s a hard time...and he hasn't.
Talent should trump name but as we have seen lately that just isn't the case. Jorge is 10x the fighter Hardy will ever be and that's just a fact. I just think it's BS he didn't get the same chance 99% of the fighters out there seem to be. I seems like everytime a fighter drops a weight class he is given 1 more chance. Almost every time. Pay could have been an issue for sure though since he was getting decent money due to his hype coming back to the UFC. But man he is still a top 15 talent and he could be even better at WW.
OU is offline  
post #10 of 51 (permalink) Old 02-06-2013, 02:43 PM
Colossal-weight
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 8,550
                     
Well I like to live in the world of reality. ANd if your performance doesn't meet your pay then it is understandable if you are cut, especially if you aren't a name people know.

Yea, he could be a lot better at WW. But I don't think size was much of a factor in any of his fights. Maybe his chin will hold up better at this weight. Who knows. Will be interesting.

I don't agree that he is 10x the fighter Hardy is. Maybe a little better, but not a great deal better in my opinion.
jonnyg4508 is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the MMA Forum - UFC Forums - UFC Results - MMA Videos forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome