So first you couldn't provide any evidence of elite strikers that Nick has beaten, and now you are trying to re-write the definition of good boxing?
You crack me up owns. I hope Nick wins on saturday, just for you
He will win and so will hendricks and thou shalt promote me to super admin in celebration, people think good boxing is just getting in and out in and in and out and some funky angles like edgar, but actually it's not that it's how much you can land and how often. Like GSP he is effective because he is always attacking with the jab however where he fails is that he doesn't have any other punches and the jab isn't as reoccuring in pace as nick's punches.
There's a reason why edgar and cruz can't finish fights sure they usually can't get hit with their in and outs but they will never finish and when they get a good opponent the technique fails badly like cruz vs faber and aldo vs edgar and maynard vs edgar or to a degree bendo vs edgar. That's all i'm saying there.