I'll never understand why so many people on this forum will never understand why some people object to women's MMA. Women are symbols of beauty, so some people - including GSP and Swedes, apparently - don't want to see beauty get bloodied and bruised. Also, in nature men are naturally fighters. Men are hunters and killers in most species while women are caregivers and nurturing. Among humans, when you go out to a bar are you more likely to see two men get into a fistfight or two women? Obviously men, because men fighting is natural while women fighting is not.
Of course some people will run in here proudly galloping on their moral high horses and exclaiming that "The only difference between a man and a woman is a piece of meat between their legs!" but this is so utterly moronic that the self-delusion required to believe such a thing is on par with New York legislators who think MMA should be illegal.
NOBODY is saying women shouldn't have the right to compete in MMA, but some people just don't want to watch it, that's all. Do we not have the right to not want to watch a certain sporting event?