Gonzaga to Challenge Loss to Browne - Page 4 - MMA Forum - UFC Forums - UFC Results - MMA Videos
UFC The Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC) is a U.S.-based mixed martial arts organization, recognized as the largest MMA promotion in the world. The UFC is headquartered in Las Vegas, Nevada and is owned and operated by Zuffa, LLC. This promotion is responsible for solidifying the sport's postion in the history-books. UFC is currently undergoing a remarkable surge in popularity, along with greater mainstream media coverage. UFC programming can now be seen on FOX, FX, and FUEL TV in the United States, as well as in 35 other countries worldwide.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #31 of 81 (permalink) Old 04-16-2013, 06:11 AM
Bantamweight
 
T.Bone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 571
                     
Although 1-2 probably did land to the back of the head, I think the main question is (and should always be) were they intentional? I don't think so.
T.Bone is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #32 of 81 (permalink) Old 04-16-2013, 09:23 PM
Flyweight
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Eastern Wa.
Posts: 356
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by MMA-Sportsman View Post
It looked irresponsible from Browne at least.
Plus. If a fighter is kicked in the nuts and can't continue to fight it shoud be what? At least a no contest. So if two of those devastating elbows did hit "accidentally" the back of the head of Gonzaga, a no contest should be declared ,again, at least.
"Looked irresponsible"? It's the ref's job to protect the fighter if he can't protect himself. The fighter is to fight until told to stop or the bell rings.
dave-stjohn is offline  
post #33 of 81 (permalink) Old 04-16-2013, 09:36 PM
Ultra-weight
 
Sportsman 2.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 7,002
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by dave-stjohn View Post
"Looked irresponsible"? It's the ref's job to protect the fighter if he can't protect himself. The fighter is to fight until told to stop or the bell rings.
So if the referee doesn't do his job properly it is OK to kick nuts, poke eyes, bite ears off? The fighter has no responsibility to keep it safe and within the rules? What is that you are saying?

Finding Your Way Through the Cloudy Mountains
RNP-AR Precision GPS-FMS Approach to Queenstown - NZ


You don't have a soul. You are a soul. You have a body.
Sportsman 2.0 is offline  
post #34 of 81 (permalink) Old 04-17-2013, 12:57 AM
All Around Nice Guy
 
SideWays222's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 10,760
                     
Yeah the first 2 looked legal to me the rest looked pretty damn illegal.

SideWays222 is offline  
post #35 of 81 (permalink) Old 04-17-2013, 01:09 AM
Middleweight
 
Trix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,780
                     
All those shots were legal.

Trix is offline  
post #36 of 81 (permalink) Old 04-17-2013, 01:26 AM
All Around Nice Guy
 
SideWays222's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 10,760
                     
I think Big Jhon described the back off the head as being the line where you wear headphones. Which seems very fair and simple. In that case those shots look very illegal to me.

SideWays222 is offline  
post #37 of 81 (permalink) Old 04-17-2013, 06:56 AM
Bantamweight
 
T.Bone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 571
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by SideWays222 View Post
I think Big Jhon described the back off the head as being the line where you wear headphones. Which seems very fair and simple. In that case those shots look very illegal to me.
I think ref's and commissions need to show some leniency though, I mean when Junior knocked out Cain it was right behind the ear which, if we use big John's definition would've been to the back of the head. I agree there should be a more definitive way to call it but I don't think the head-phone analogy is 100% the way to go.

It happens a lot in this sport, sometimes purposefully but more often then not it's completely unintentional and I think the most important things to try and distinguish are things like: were the shots intentional? Did the recipient of the shots move his head in such a way the shot was unavoidable?

I think a bit of discretion needs to be used in these cases, it's a fight and sometimes stuff like this is just unavoidable. You're trying to hit the other guy in the head as hard as you can and as a consequence sometimes you miss.
T.Bone is offline  
post #38 of 81 (permalink) Old 04-17-2013, 09:38 AM
Number 1 Nerf-Herder
 
Dr Gonzo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 2,506
                     
5 and possibly 6 looked illegal, both due to the 12-6 rule and the no shots to the back of the head rule. Others looked fine.




Watch The Trews! True news! Subscribe here!!


https://m.youtube.com/user/russellbrand
Dr Gonzo is offline  
post #39 of 81 (permalink) Old 04-17-2013, 03:06 PM
MMA Fanatic
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 54
               
Quote:
Originally Posted by amoosenamedhank View Post
The third elbow started dropping him and it was located above the ear (but not in the 'mowhawk section'. The 4th elbow completely put him out. If you watch the gifs, Gonzaga slumped over causing the angle of his head to change, causing an off angle attack.
So much bullshit here.

Gonzaga NEVER slumped over, watch the tape again. Travis threw the 4th KO elbow(the one that caused referee to stop the fight btw) intentionally to the back of head and if he was not on DMT or some other mind altering drug - i would say he was aware of the fact that he is shooting to the back of head.

This elbow knocked gonzaga Out. The thing is if intentional, ilegal(12/6+ BOH) elbow KOed Gonzaga out and referee stopped the fight.. because of that KO.... then the victory is ILEGAL as well. PERIOD.
iksanivica is offline  
post #40 of 81 (permalink) Old 04-17-2013, 03:17 PM
MMA Fanatic
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 54
               
Quote:
Originally Posted by T.Bone View Post
I think ref's and commissions need to show some leniency though, I mean when Junior knocked out Cain it was right behind the ear which, if we use big John's definition would've been to the back of the head. I agree there should be a more definitive way to call it but I don't think the head-phone analogy is 100% the way to go.

It happens a lot in this sport, sometimes purposefully but more often then not it's completely unintentional and I think the most important things to try and distinguish are things like: were the shots intentional? Did the recipient of the shots move his head in such a way the shot was unavoidable?
Perfectly avoidable... Is fighter eager to KO his opponent any way possible? YES. Is it avoidable to strike ilegally and possible to control yourself and respect the rules? YES it is.

It would be unavoidable if Gonzaga's head suddenly changed motion but this did not happen, watch the tape.

Gonzaga was far from energetic and movable at that moment...
and Travis had all the time in the world to see where his final elbow strike is going ...(the elbow that caused KO and made referee stop the fight)....

So in my judgment I would say it is an ilegal victory and Gonzaga deserves a completely new match.

It all seems to happen so fast i know but it is not fast in the octagon subjective perception of time slows down so keep that in mind too.

What worries me is that Travis had a feeling, a hunch or perhaps even a concious thought...that this would go unpunished.

It's the "I had to kill him!!" syndrome i m afraid.
iksanivica is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the MMA Forum - UFC Forums - UFC Results - MMA Videos forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome