Illegal elbow rocked Chael - Page 5 - MMA Forum - UFC Forums - UFC Results - MMA Videos
UFC The Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC) is a U.S.-based mixed martial arts organization, recognized as the largest MMA promotion in the world. The UFC is headquartered in Las Vegas, Nevada and is owned and operated by Zuffa, LLC. This promotion is responsible for solidifying the sport's postion in the history-books. UFC is currently undergoing a remarkable surge in popularity, along with greater mainstream media coverage. UFC programming can now be seen on FOX, FX, and FUEL TV in the United States, as well as in 35 other countries worldwide.

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #41 of 65 (permalink) Old 05-01-2013, 02:01 PM
Voiceless's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Neo-Babylon
Posts: 3,570
Originally Posted by osmium View Post
The motion is what is illegal not hitting someone with the point of your elbow. He is using a forward motion on Chael not 12-6. It has to be straight up and straight down like the second gif if you change the motion slightly in any way it is legal. The rule is pretty absurd.
I don't think it's that absurd, at least when the target is the face, because a downward spiking elbow could severely damage the eyes, while when the motion is not straight downward the force is less directly on the eyes, but rather distributed to the bone around the eye. I would allow 12-6 elbows to any other legal area than the face though.
Voiceless is offline  
Sponsored Links
post #42 of 65 (permalink) Old 05-01-2013, 02:41 PM
MMA fighter
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Dessel, Belgium
Posts: 201
Blog Entries: 1
Originally Posted by AlphaDawg View Post
Well not necessarily. You'd have to think the fight would be stopped if the doctor checked out Jones' toe. If Jones didn't land the elbow, Chael might've survived till the second. He could be champ right now. Granted an illegitimate champ, but a champ nonetheless.
Yeah but if Jones didn't land that elbow he would've landed 5 or more other elbows so I think it doesn't matter because Chael was not fighting back in the first place.

He wasn't rocked though and could continue obviously, but we all know how vicious Jones' elbows are and I think Jones would've won in those other seconds he had left in the round.

But if Chael somehow made it to the 2nd then he would be Champ because I don't think the doctor would allow Jones to continue with that foot.

Sent from Free App

Follow my brand new blog about MMA and let me know what you think! => MMA Europe Blog

I'm supporting:
HW: Cain Velasquez, Pat Barry
LHW: Jon Jones, Chael Sonnen
MW: Chris Weidman, Michael Kuiper
WW: Demian Maia
LW: Benson Henderson, Clay Guida
FW: Jose Aldo
kney is offline  
post #43 of 65 (permalink) Old 05-01-2013, 04:12 PM
Sambo de Amigo's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: The Land of Truth
Posts: 2,311
To be honest its not worth discussing simply because it had zero contribution to the outcome.

Bisping Fan extraordinaire

Velasquez will be back

Sambo de Amigo is offline  
post #44 of 65 (permalink) Old 05-01-2013, 07:02 PM
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 328
If there was an illegal elbow there it was borderline at best.

Here's a link to a good quality gif, from a 60 frame per second video ... it's about 200MB, so be patient it will take a while to load.

The first elbow may have looked to be technically a 12-6 on the poor quality gif, but it looked to me on a better quality view to be a very short elbow going down and forward, and a ref would be a complete moron to call that a foul as at that point any short elbow from the top would have to be called a foul since it's basically a couple of inches of downward and forward movement.

The second elbow was an obvious arc across Chael's face moving from Jon's right to left.
NoYards is offline  
post #45 of 65 (permalink) Old 05-01-2013, 10:26 PM
You're Welcome.
Canadian Psycho's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Eh?
Posts: 7,723
I don't particularly care. Chael didn't complain, and frankly, I'm not inclined to complain on his behalf. But this idea that rule breaking should only be of consequence when it effects the ultimate outcome is a bit ridiculous. Breaking the rules is breaking the rules.

Chael didn't defeat Anderson, so maybe he shouldn't have been suspended for six months for testing high. I mean, it didn't effect the end result!
Canadian Psycho is offline  
post #46 of 65 (permalink) Old 05-02-2013, 05:29 AM
of Nazareth
Soojooko's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: The Moon
Posts: 9,305
Originally Posted by Canadian Psycho View Post
Chael didn't defeat Anderson, so maybe he shouldn't have been suspended for six months for testing high. I mean, it didn't effect the end result!
Good point.
Soojooko is offline  
post #47 of 65 (permalink) Old 05-02-2013, 01:38 PM
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Eastern Wa.
Posts: 356
Originally Posted by Soojooko View Post
Good point.
Same for Nick Diaz. I'm thinking he should have had an extra point or something, if you can come in in that kind of shape and fight that well while smoking weed that's some serious willpower.
dave-stjohn is offline  
post #48 of 65 (permalink) Old 05-02-2013, 02:07 PM
GDPofDRB's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 2,212
Opinion's on drugs aside, in fight fouls committed by fighters are not the same thing as a fighter being non-compliant with drug usage policy.
GDPofDRB is offline  
post #49 of 65 (permalink) Old 05-02-2013, 02:15 PM
The Internet Prophet
deadmanshand's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,750
Jesus people it was not an illegal elbow. Jones arm may have been straight up and down but that was not the motion of the elbow. He thrust forward with the elbow. For it to be illegal the elbow has to come straight down.

This whole thread shows an appalling lack of education on what is allowed by the rules.

That is not dead which can eternal lie and withs strange aeons even death may die.
deadmanshand is offline  
post #50 of 65 (permalink) Old 05-02-2013, 02:17 PM
You're Welcome.
Canadian Psycho's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Eh?
Posts: 7,723
They're both contrary to the rules. No one is arguing that they're the exact same, but you can certainly make the comparison that if breaking the rules during a fight is okay if it's ultimately of no consequence, then breaking the rules outside of a fight must also be okay if it's ultimately of no consequence.

You can't just brush it off by saying they're different scenarios. That's a cop-out. We're talking about rule breaking and people having no problem with it because it made no difference. Last I checked, that wasn't the point of having rules.
Canadian Psycho is offline  

Quick Reply

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the MMA Forum - UFC Forums - UFC Results - MMA Videos forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:


Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On

For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome