0,5 point system would solve judging robberies - MMA Forum - UFC Forums - UFC Results - MMA Videos
UFC The Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC) is a U.S.-based mixed martial arts organization, recognized as the largest MMA promotion in the world. The UFC is headquartered in Las Vegas, Nevada and is owned and operated by Zuffa, LLC. This promotion is responsible for solidifying the sport's postion in the history-books. UFC is currently undergoing a remarkable surge in popularity, along with greater mainstream media coverage. UFC programming can now be seen on FOX, FX, and FUEL TV in the United States, as well as in 35 other countries worldwide.

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #1 of 22 (permalink) Old 05-01-2013, 07:13 PM Thread Starter
UFC86's Avatar
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 982
0,5 point system would solve judging robberies

The Athletic commission takes the model from boxing where there are many rounds scored either 10 or 9, with 8 in case of a knockdown. This is flawed because MMA is more difficult to judge due to it's nature, and there are usually only 3-5 rounds. When a judge doesn't know who won, he should give 0.5 to each, but usually they follow intuition or some type of bias and give someone the round. If there is a clear winner 10-9 would be fine, and if there is complete domination 10-8 may be awarded.

Fights like Bisping vs. Hamill, Shogun vs. Machida, Machida vs. Rampage off the top of my head and many others may have different outcomes.

This may not however, be solution for fights like Melendez vs. Benson that could be scored as a draw, but that's why there are rematches.

Following: Cain , JDS, Werdum, Shogun, Machida, Weidman, Pettis, Aldo, Melendez
UFC86 is offline  
Sponsored Links
post #2 of 22 (permalink) Old 05-01-2013, 08:56 PM
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 327
Even with 10 point must, judges occasionally score rounds 10-10. The solution to judging 'robberies', is to risk losing by trying for a finish.
HellRazor is offline  
post #3 of 22 (permalink) Old 05-01-2013, 10:12 PM
dsmjrv's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: manhattan beach, CA
Posts: 1,013
i agree, 0.5 could solve some issues.. personally when scoring a fight i will give score 10-6 for dominant rounds, and only give 10-9 if its very close but one fighter edged it out... 10-7 and 10-8 rounds are judged accordingly too.

i know this is not how the fight is gonna play out in real life but lets take Penn vs Fitch for example... i would give 10-9 or 10-8 rounds to penn for the first two rounds, and the last would be a big whopper of a 10-6 for fifth.. making fitch the winner of the fight overall..

i cant remember the fight exactly but lets just say penn got the first two rounds 10-8 and 10-9 and fitch the last round 10-6

that would make the score 27-26 for fitch... something like this might make for a better scoring system...

Head-butting fists and KOing the air is not effective striking.
dsmjrv is offline  
post #4 of 22 (permalink) Old 05-01-2013, 10:15 PM
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 5,499
Let me look for the article but the CA commission did a test of this and determined that it really didn't change anything at all.
cdtcpl is offline  
post #5 of 22 (permalink) Old 05-01-2013, 10:26 PM
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,297
If judges scored rounds a draw, that would solve things pretty much. No shame in fights being draws either, I dunno why there is such a bad stigma behind them. I guess it's communist to score draws or something lmao

Another thing they can do is have a sudden death round, have it be like 1 minute long or something, and the fighters know to swing for the fences for that one minute. Then winner of that round wins the fight, problem solved.
ptw is offline  
post #6 of 22 (permalink) Old 05-01-2013, 10:36 PM
Cruz Control
LL's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Ocean Front Property in Arizona.
Posts: 9,120
No time limits brehs.

Its perfect because Edgar would never lose.

Sent from Verticalsports.com Free App

2013 VIP FFL Champion
Machida - Alves - Cruz - JDS - Weidman - Condit - Pettis - Edgar - Cowboy - Dodson - Okami
LL is offline  
post #7 of 22 (permalink) Old 05-01-2013, 11:28 PM
dlxrevolution's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,500
They already did this in Canada for a little while, when Ryan Jimmo beat Soukuju by 48.5 to 47.5 decision (or something like that). The only thing that would change is the fighters with 2 really dominant rounds might win.
dlxrevolution is offline  
post #8 of 22 (permalink) Old 05-02-2013, 05:35 AM
of Nazareth
Soojooko's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: The Moon
Posts: 9,310
Why not just use a scale from 1 to 10 and be done with it.

10-9 round = extremely close round.
10-1 round = monumental beatdown.

So if a fighter loses the first 2 rounds 10-7, he can still win a decision by winning the last round very impressively. eg. 10-3.

In fights like Edgar vs Maynard 1, the first round should count for a lot more then a solitary point. If you take a first round beating like that, and then win the next 4 rounds 10-9, you would still lose. Thats how I think this shit should be scored.

I now await somebody to inevitably come along and blow massive holes in my theory.
Soojooko is offline  
post #9 of 22 (permalink) Old 05-02-2013, 05:38 AM
It's Hammer Time!
Hammerlock2.0's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Germany
Posts: 9,589
How about we get rid of judges and rounds?

Rookie Hammer Squad 2015
Frankie Edgar - Dominick Cruz - Jorge Masvidal - Cat Zingano - Holly Holm
Hammerlock2.0 is offline  
post #10 of 22 (permalink) Old 05-02-2013, 08:17 AM
of Nazareth
Soojooko's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: The Moon
Posts: 9,310
Originally Posted by Hammerlock2.0 View Post
How about we get rid of judges and rounds?
And tap-outs.
Soojooko is offline  

Quick Reply

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the MMA Forum - UFC Forums - UFC Results - MMA Videos forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:


Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On

For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome