I don't know where this idea of Bisping as the anti-wrestler comes from.
He has fought 4 wrestlers in his entire career and basically lost to all of them. The only "win" was his SD over Hammill and we all know how much of a win that was.
He got taken down and slammed repeatedly by Rashad, Sonnen and Hammill. Hendo didn't because he was beating him on the feet and knocked him out.
Weidman does the same, except he has better GnP than any of those guys and probably finishes Bisping on the ground. Maybe Bisping survives because he has decent ground defense, scrambles and butterfly guard, but he still loses the UD.
Weidman also has better standup and power than any of the other wrestlers that beat Bisping other than Hendo, and he could KO him standing as well. Bisping was barely even in striking with Rashad, Hamill and Sonnen, Weidman is better standing up than all of them and more like Hendo.
I honestly don't see how Bisping wins this. If Anderson and Uriah hall couldn't do it then I doubt Bisping is finishing Weidman standing with the limited power he has, and it's highly unlikely he'll be able to jab him to a decision without getting taken down repeatedly.