Ken Shamrock .vs. Stephan Bonnar who would win? - MMA Forum - UFC Forums - UFC Results - MMA Videos
UFC The Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC) is a U.S.-based mixed martial arts organization, recognized as the largest MMA promotion in the world. The UFC is headquartered in Las Vegas, Nevada and is owned and operated by Zuffa, LLC. This promotion is responsible for solidifying the sport's postion in the history-books. UFC is currently undergoing a remarkable surge in popularity, along with greater mainstream media coverage. UFC programming can now be seen on FOX, FX, and FUEL TV in the United States, as well as in 35 other countries worldwide.

View Poll Results: Stephan Bonnar .vs. Ken Shamrock, who would win?
Stephan Bonnar 5 29.41%
The worlds weakest man Ken Shamrock 12 70.59%
Voters: 17. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #1 of 19 (permalink) Old 08-14-2006, 11:40 PM Thread Starter
Hero Of The Day
 
Rush's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 1,177
 
Ken Shamrock .vs. Stephan Bonnar who would win?

My money is on Stephan Bonnar, he would win against Shamrock either 2nd round 5:00 Doctor Stoppage or TKO Strikes. Anyone else agree? Once Shamrock gets on the ground on his back the fight ends.
Rush is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 19 (permalink) Old 08-14-2006, 11:54 PM
Flyweight
 
lanceis2buff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 215
                     
I cant believe you are really serious. If Rashad Evans can dominate Bonnar then I think that Shamrock will wipe him up. Get real dude.
lanceis2buff is offline  
post #3 of 19 (permalink) Old 08-14-2006, 11:56 PM Thread Starter
Hero Of The Day
 
Rush's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 1,177
 
No, Ken Shamrock can't beat Bonnar IMO. Ken Shamrock would lose to Evans badly and get knocked out by Griffin. Bonnar at least stayed in the fight against Griffin. Bonnar can beat Shamrock along with any other light heavyweight in the UFC if they can take Shamrock to the ground.
Rush is offline  
post #4 of 19 (permalink) Old 08-15-2006, 12:04 AM
Flyweight
 
lanceis2buff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 215
                     
If you are saying that Shamrock's ground game is weak based on his matches with Tito then you must need a little sleep. Tito's game IS the ground, he's beaten the best in the business by doing his ground game, because he is the best in the world at it. But if you're saying that Bonnar could take Shamrock on the ground and beat him, then you need a little wake up call. Shamrock's game lately has been his stand-up, and he'll put on a slug fest with Bonnar or Griffin and I don't see much of an advantage for Bonnar or Griffin. It's a nice little dream of yours, but I don't see it happen in the real world.
lanceis2buff is offline  
post #5 of 19 (permalink) Old 08-15-2006, 01:17 AM Thread Starter
Hero Of The Day
 
Rush's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 1,177
 
Why do Shamrock fans like you always have to come back by saying "Ken Shamrocks ground doesn't suck just because of Tito". Ken Shamrock lost to Rich Franklin, Kazushi Sakuraba as soon as he fell to the ground as well in his most recent fights besides Tito 2.
Rush is offline  
post #6 of 19 (permalink) Old 08-15-2006, 11:42 AM
Flyweight
 
iceman574's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 213
                     
bonner beat SHAMROCK haha ha ha ha ha ha ha HA HA HA HA UH IT HURTS LOOK why is it that you think shamrock would lose to bonner the problem with shamrock is that he allways fights elite fighters sutch as franklin, otiz ect now say if shamrock would comeback and fight his way up he would do well. take tanner for egsample he destroys all his oponents but when he comes to fighting a champion he loses tanner lost to franklin twice and got humiliated when fought tito is he a crap fighter no he is one of the best just not at the elite level now take SHAMROCK just cos he lost to tito doesnt meen bonner would beat him you fool if they was to FIGHT IT WOULD BE NO DIFFERENT THAN NATE VS FRANKLIN OR LEBEN VS SILVIA

GET REAL!!

GO ON SHAMROCK KNOCK HIS HAIR BLACK THEN SPANK HIS ASS AND IN THE LAST ROUND BEAT HIM INTO LIVIN DEATH LOL
iceman574 is offline  
post #7 of 19 (permalink) Old 08-15-2006, 01:47 PM
MMA Fanatic
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 7
 
I personally dont like shamrock and i dont think hes that great of a fighter. But cmon bonnar is over rated shamrock would beat him standing on the ground where ever
bangin101 is offline  
post #8 of 19 (permalink) Old 08-15-2006, 08:19 PM
Lightweight
 
Punishment 101's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Huntington Beach, CA
Posts: 1,788
                     
Bonnar would KO/TKO old Shammy, These fighters from UFC 1 dont stand a chance against the level of competition of todays fighters, they are just tooo one dimensional , and it sucks seeing them get there asses kicked all the time but hey , the old sayings true , "out with the old and in with the new" , Lennox Lewis said it perfect , "You cant teach an old dog new tricks" which has been proven time and time again
Punishment 101 is offline  
post #9 of 19 (permalink) Old 08-16-2006, 12:36 AM
Bantamweight
 
Spit206Fire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 669
               
Bonnar sucks are you guys kidding me?

WHO HAS HE BEAT? LOL

I mean Rashard Evans destroyed him.

What is it that is going to be on your mind when you're on your death bed? Will it be the tedious years of 9 to 5, or the memory of some great acheivement. Maybe a moment you stood in glory to the applause of millions.
-Evan Tanner
Spit206Fire is offline  
post #10 of 19 (permalink) Old 08-16-2006, 02:34 AM
Lightweight
 
Punishment 101's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Huntington Beach, CA
Posts: 1,788
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spit206Fire
Bonnar sucks are you guys kidding me?

WHO HAS HE BEAT? LOL

I mean Rashard Evans destroyed him.

wow no big deal in losing to Rashad Evans, hes a damn good fighter , you must be a fool for thinkin Shammy can beat em ... Rashad would manhandle the old man

since you like to judge fights like that , Bonnar gave Forrest a helluva fight ( i personally think he won it ) but oh well he lost , and Forrest gave Tito a good go .... so doesnt that tell you 1 Rashad is a damn good fighter for absolutely manhandling Bonnar a man that went to war with Forrest in such a close fight, and 2 how long did Shammy last with Ortiz ? exactly. Forrest hung in there with Tito showing that Bonnar/Griffin/Evans/the new era are way too much for Ken Shamrock , thats for damn sure
Punishment 101 is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the MMA Forum - UFC Forums - UFC Results - MMA Videos forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome