Rubbish. Im saying it because its the truth. Right now, beating Gus would carry more kudos for Jones then beating Tex. Does anybody disagree?
I disagree. I don't think beating a guy twice (assuming both fights are within a short time period) is as impressive as beating two different guys. It's not like it was a 48-47 split decision. It was a clear unanimous decision win for Bones. I think it would be more impressive to add another good name to his resume of guys beaten (if he beats Glover).
well, why wouldn't he be? no one likes a phony.. and I hate douchebags, so if the "real" Jones is one why should I like him then? I don't see what's hard to understand here...
Chuck Liddell, there was a real champ... Just say he'd knock guys out, and didn't care who they placed in front of him.
Very fair point. But it's one thing to not like the way he comes across, and another thing to say how he shouldn't be dismissing challengers etc, when all he's really doing is answering questions.
Are you implying Bones isn't a real champ? Has there been one individual that the UFC wanted Bones to fight, and he didn't end up fighting him? If Bones in the last three years has defeated Shogun, Rampage, Machida, Rashad, Belfort, Sonnen, Gus, and is now going to fight Tex...does giving opinions on deserved contenders impact how "real" of a champ he is?