Tito v Rashad 2 and MMA's new sense of entitlement - Page 2 - MMA Forum - UFC Forums - UFC Results - MMA Videos
UFC The Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC) is a U.S.-based mixed martial arts organization, recognized as the largest MMA promotion in the world. The UFC is headquartered in Las Vegas, Nevada and is owned and operated by Zuffa, LLC. This promotion is responsible for solidifying the sport's postion in the history-books. UFC is currently undergoing a remarkable surge in popularity, along with greater mainstream media coverage. UFC programming can now be seen on FOX, FX, and FUEL TV in the United States, as well as in 35 other countries worldwide.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #11 of 21 (permalink) Old 10-01-2007, 06:12 PM
Flyweight
 
KenFl07's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 261
 
it's not that Rashad was dominating, but he was starting to turn up the heat on Ortiz IMO. Rashad missed a few takedowns that he could have had and a couple were stopped by Ortiz because he was grabbing the fence. If Rashad had gotten it to the ground, I think the scoring would have been different. Rashad took Ortiz down at the very end of the 3rd as well and looked to be gaining confidence against Ortiz. So, had it gone another round, I think Rashad would have won the fight.
KenFl07 is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #12 of 21 (permalink) Old 10-01-2007, 07:13 PM
I'm the Decider
 
wafb's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 3,239
Blog Entries: 1
                     
I wasn't too keen about the rematch anyway. Rashad continue building his career without fighting Tito again. Bonnar,Sinosic, Alexander, Bisping and maybe Forrest could fight him.



Pound4Pound, The Best There Is
wafb is offline  
post #13 of 21 (permalink) Old 10-01-2007, 07:50 PM Thread Starter
Middleweight
 
Flak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,757
                     
Who was winning, or who would win the rematch is irrelevent. If the UFC don't want to market Rashad and let him go eventually, it doesn't matter if he beats Ortiz or not. Similarly, if the UFC wants Rashad to succeed, he'll get bigger fights.

As it stands, Ortiz is still a big name and a draw - so he's used to rescue a lackluster card. Rashad will get a big name again soon enough - or not. None of that has to do with a rematch with Ortiz though.

Demian Maia may be the Fred Astaire of jiu-jitsu, but it’s too bad Silva is the Gene Kelly of kicking everyone’s ass.
Flak is offline  
post #14 of 21 (permalink) Old 10-01-2007, 09:36 PM
 
Toxic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: See that guy over in the window, with the binoculars?
Posts: 21,821
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by wafb
I wasn't too keen about the rematch anyway. Rashada continue building his career without fighting Tito again. Bonnar,Sinosic, Alexander, Bisping and maybe Forrest could fight him.
Would you seriously put one fighter you named besides Forest at or above Tito's level?? Are you trying to state that going from fighting Tito to fighting Bispling isnt a step down???
Toxic is offline  
post #15 of 21 (permalink) Old 10-01-2007, 09:50 PM
Banned
 
Negative1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,238
Blog Entries: 3
                     
Tito/Rashad II? No I wouldn't let you pay me to watch that, not interesting at all. Its already been 6 years since they fought and it has lost all of its hype now, had their rematch been at UFN or something, then yeah the rematch would be justified. I dont understand why either, neither of them were injured.
Negative1 is offline  
post #16 of 21 (permalink) Old 10-01-2007, 09:55 PM
I'm the Decider
 
wafb's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 3,239
Blog Entries: 1
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by bellr77
Would you seriously put one fighter you named besides Forest at or above Tito's level?? Are you trying to state that going from fighting Tito to fighting Bispling isnt a step down???
I'm just saying we don't need to see another Tito and Rashad fight again since there plenty of possible matchup for Evans. It's not a stepdown fighting Bisping since he's on a streak, who has Tito beaten lately besides a middle aged Ken Shamrock?



Pound4Pound, The Best There Is
wafb is offline  
post #17 of 21 (permalink) Old 10-01-2007, 10:34 PM
KinG
 
SlaveTrade's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,261
                     
Sadly.. I just don't care for Rashad Evans or Tito Ortiz.
Tito Ortiz always talks a mean game, but doesn't come through.

Give Tito Ortiz to either Dan, Wandy, or Shogun. He's boring as hell, but he is a big name so he should make himself useful and get the beating he's bound to recieve.
DO IT FOR THE FANS!



Pride of KOREA:

Yoshihiro Akiyama (Choo Sung Hoon)
Denis "The Super Korean" Kang
Yoon Dong Sik
Dong Hyun "Stun Gun" Kim
Bu Kyung Jung
Hong Man "The Techno Goliath" Choi
SlaveTrade is offline  
post #18 of 21 (permalink) Old 10-01-2007, 11:25 PM
 
Toxic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: See that guy over in the window, with the binoculars?
Posts: 21,821
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by wafb
I'm just saying we don't need to see another Tito and Rashad fight again since there plenty of possible matchup for Evans. It's not a stepdown fighting Bisping since he's on a streak, who has Tito beaten lately besides a middle aged Ken Shamrock?
Bispling is not on a "Streak" he just got his ass handed to him by Hamill regardless of who got the win, besides Bispling definatly has some unfinished buissiness and that is one rematch I DO want to see.

Tito may not have beaten anybody of any relevancy in a long time but he still is a former champ and it still means more than a second rate TUF alum,

If Tito gets Wandy or Hendo the only way to keep it even is if Rashad gets the other, go with Tito/Wandy and Rashad/Hendo that I can live with I just think its bullshit that Tito keeps getting to go back up the card just for being Tito.
Toxic is offline  
post #19 of 21 (permalink) Old 10-01-2007, 11:30 PM
Welterweight
 
Calibretto9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,218
                     
Great post by the OP, and I agree completely. Both guys had their shot, and proved that at this stage in their career they're both too closely matched. The fight wasn't interesting, and as the OP said, they're not entitled to a rematch. Griffin and Bonnar got a rematch because the first one was so cool, but that shouldn't be the standard for every close fight. Excellent thread.
Calibretto9 is offline  
post #20 of 21 (permalink) Old 10-01-2007, 11:32 PM
MMA Fanatic
 
FactioNN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 91
                     
In all honesty I wouldnt want to see this fight again. But if they did schedule it I wouldnt stay away from it. Possibly due to the fact of the mouthing off they do to each other.

Kenny KenFlo Florian. The man the myth the legend
FactioNN is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the MMA Forum - UFC Forums - UFC Results - MMA Videos forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome